From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxH2V-0006yb-56 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:22:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxH2U-0001bH-89 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:21:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:21:46 +0200 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Message-ID: <20161020172146.GA25226@toto> References: <1476784025-27293-1-git-send-email-ppandit@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] char: cadence: check divider against baud rate List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: P J P Cc: Alistair Francis , Peter Maydell , qemu-arm , Huawei PSIRT , Qemu Developers On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:25:47AM +0530, P J P wrote: > +-- On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Alistair Francis wrote --+ > | I don't think the Cadence datasheets are public. If you can't find it > | from a simple Google search I don't think you have access. > > I see, okay. > > I think it'll greatly help if device emulator writers include a link to its > specification/datasheet resources in the respective source file. At least if > these are publicly available. That way one knows for sure which specifications > to follow while debugging, instead of searching and sifting through multiple > different versions. OR Maybe there could a field in the MAINTAINERS file which > would point to respective reference resources. (just a thought) Hi, The UART is described in the Zynq TRMs, I think you can just google for zynq TRM and a reference to UG585 and UG1085 will come up. http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug585-Zynq-7000-TRM.pdf http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug1085-zynq-ultrascale-trm.pdf AFAIK, the ZynqMP has a newer version of the cadence UART with a superset of the feature set. I don't think QEMU models any of the differences though. Cheers, Edgar > > Thank you. > -- > Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team > 47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F >