From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxDND-0000i3-DB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:27:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxDN9-0006Mu-7Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:27:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:26:43 +1100 From: Nicholas Piggin Message-ID: <20161021002643.73bcb0d3@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20161020134925.76598373@bahia> References: <20161020065912.16132-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20161020134925.76598373@bahia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] (no subject) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Kurz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Gibson On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:49:25 +0200 Greg Kurz wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:59:09 +1100 > Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:38:24 +1100 > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ppc: system reset interrupt fixes and new hcall IPI > > > > Hi, > > > > We are implementing this new unmaskable IPI hcall for crash dumping > > and debugging. I had some issues with QEMU delivering system reset > > interrupt to guests, which was caused by the HV bit being set. After > > changing that, the interrupt was being handled okay. Should there be > > a more general check to ensure the HV bit is not set in the guest? > > > > I implemented Linux support for the new hcall in crashdump code, and > > it works. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > Nicholas Piggin (3): > > ppc: fix MSR_ME handling for system reset interrupt > > ppc: allow system reset interrupt to be delivered to guests > > ppc/spapr: implement H_SIGNAL_SYS_RESET > > > > hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 8 +++++++- > > target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Weird... these patches didn't make it to qemu-devel. As a result, they > don't appear in patchwork and http://wiki.qemu.org/patches/patches.json Maybe because I messed up the first mail. I'll resend the series after feedback. Thanks, Nick