From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxaZ6-0004op-Ki for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:12:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxaZ1-0007M3-Li for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:12:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxaZ1-0007Lf-Ga for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:12:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:12:47 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20161021161247.14cbb12e@nial.brq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20161021082801.dglwfsocljohquok@hz-desktop> References: <20161021082801.dglwfsocljohquok@hz-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression caused by d2f39ad "exec.c: Ensure right alignment also for file backed ram" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Haozhong Zhang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chao.p.peng@intel.com, Eduardo Habkost , Peter Crosthwaite , Dominik Dingel , anthony.xu@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:28:01 +0800 Haozhong Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > Commit d2f39ad "exec.c: Ensure right alignment also for file backed > ram" added an additional alignment requirement besides to the previous > page size for the size of the backend file. On x86, the alignment > requirement for the size of the backend file is changed from 4KB in > QEMU 2.6 to 2MB in QEMU 2.7. > > This change immediately breaks the usage of "-object memory-backend-file,...,size=$SIZE" > on x86, where $SIZE is multiple of 4KB but not 2MB. It works on QEMU 2.6. > Could this be considered as a regression? > > The commit message shows it's for s390. I'm wondering whether the same > regression happens on s390 and ARM. If not, could I fix the regression > on x86 by keeping using the original alignment only on x86, e.g. > > modified exec.c > @@ -1254,7 +1254,11 @@ static void *file_ram_alloc(RAMBlock *block, > } > > block->page_size = qemu_fd_getpagesize(fd); > +#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) SPAPR supports mem hotplug so it's also affected > + block->mr->align = block->page_size; > +#else > block->mr->align = MAX(block->page_size, QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN); > +#endif > > if (memory < block->page_size) { > error_setg(errp, "memory size 0x" RAM_ADDR_FMT " must be equal to " > > > Thanks, > Haozhong >