From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byjn9-0000wz-6G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:16:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byjn5-0005qN-6X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:16:11 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:60131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byjn5-0005qF-2V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:16:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:16:06 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20161024181606.GB30266@flamenco> References: <1477330788-14996-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1477330788-14996-5-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1477330788-14996-5-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 04/37] atomics: Add __nocheck atomic operations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:39:15 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > While the check against sizeof(void *) is appropriate for > normal usage within qemu, there are places in which we want > wider operaions and have checked for their existance. s/operaions/operations/ > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: Emilio G. Cota E.