From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byroj-0002gL-Iw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:50:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byroi-0006nh-Iz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:50:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:41:29 +1100 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20161025014129.GN11052@umbus.fritz.box> References: <20161013222835.GP18039@umbus.fritz.box> <20161014102759.566a1c5e@bahia> <20161017165126.7445.53992@loki> <20161017181348.29726.67454@loki> <20161017212431.29726.22702@loki> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YuJye9aIuN0w6xGV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161017212431.29726.22702@loki> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 0/4] ppc patches for qemu-2.7 stable branch List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Greg Kurz , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , qemu-stable , QEMU Developers --YuJye9aIuN0w6xGV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:24:31PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote: > Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21) > > On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth w= rote: > > > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular > > > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for > > > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's a = bit > > > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging > > > format they want for a particular tree. > >=20 > > Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not > > very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support > > multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but > > it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body". > > People who actively want to look for stuff not to go > > into master can filter it however they like. >=20 > Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be > prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though. >=20 > I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something > like this? So.. regardless of the outcome in general for future stable merges.. Has this batch been merged for 2.7 stable? Or do I need to resend it in the new style? --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --YuJye9aIuN0w6xGV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYDrhIAAoJEGw4ysog2bOSyLwP/164USVOY2awOgafsnvBzLCp MERzimvrcKN3UYEZlZAalk6jGxZZkoeZp2UxCXjqApmY6ZiiGGYNvA8IEWfqBv6k IhRWLsFeCPdqfyBtdXCX6HFgI/O5wnbksvHmkOCVBcA89VmHz5JD5ZPfIk7xwx72 s8QpSbYyw9yWnUCjTGEPCP+LnNEwuPpdIZ5csDhFcA8OnM/ARj/MJJf5ucr2/60E XAMZeGr7qbb6e5D9AJthbJmfgJvmwxccBLn13a2OtcbVJE5lr0PcoxZOUUFKA27W jX0IVIaPld/qiNk+XvPVGglC0w9yNJBPCI5lQcuSV1HvVreNpafsPM7mpbo8mrz8 xLOPWCnsjYKVCxZuNMdIgqQsts5CBD8i95L9zEjjVzd93Y3YYDWyK4junkMGCJGZ EVLa2Pd3zZy6bEzYOEAZeIA6g9xk6l5aBi4KYIZ1Eb4WJLkoyoZvBMhVaGwLYCOf aOJRr3MGMtqPFsOhJ/T58wdE9VAdSuI8VkdDZSfYaKX8dVxEnHEc010J9hGO+aUW 4TFWDRxsBxLau1EWNO04diqxaKqNyo6neKSNth2zsf9HCyAik7zF9Lhf93ASJ8hD tgxqL4JXjKiajuRZG75BLtWutlgLzGQ4W6Rklhi0UgwV2Hjff7KQ+vA963sEcfs7 0GN179Oy7Mn5ilTiJrly =eZzJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YuJye9aIuN0w6xGV--