From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzBbM-0000ho-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:57:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzBbI-0005ij-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:57:52 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:60744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzBbI-0005iL-Ey for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:57:48 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u9PNs1I1069289 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:57:47 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26aexj6nbu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:57:46 -0400 Received: from localhost by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:57:46 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Michael Roth In-Reply-To: <20161025014129.GN11052@umbus.fritz.box> References: <20161014102759.566a1c5e@bahia> <20161017165126.7445.53992@loki> <20161017181348.29726.67454@loki> <20161017212431.29726.22702@loki> <20161025014129.GN11052@umbus.fritz.box> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:57:33 -0500 Message-Id: <20161025235733.17113.25771@loki> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 0/4] ppc patches for qemu-2.7 stable branch List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Greg Kurz , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , qemu-stable , QEMU Developers Quoting David Gibson (2016-10-24 20:41:29) > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:24:31PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote: > > Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21) > > > On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth = wrote: > > > > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular > > > > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for > > > > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's = a bit > > > > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging > > > > format they want for a particular tree. > > > = > > > Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not > > > very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support > > > multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but > > > it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body". > > > People who actively want to look for stuff not to go > > > into master can filter it however they like. > > = > > Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be > > prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though. > > = > > I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something > > like this? > = > So.. regardless of the outcome in general for future stable merges.. > = > Has this batch been merged for 2.7 stable? Or do I need to resend it > in the new style? No need to resend. I should have the initial staging tree for 2.7 posted by Monday and will have this included. > = > -- = > David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _othe= r_ > | _way_ _around_! > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson