From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@daynix.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] e1000e: No need to validate configuration on migration
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:22:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027122228.GC2033@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161027113909.GG5057@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
* Eduardo Habkost (ehabkost@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:42:53AM +0300, Dmitry Fleytman wrote:
> >
> > > On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:21 PM, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The user (or management software) is responsible for keeping the
> > > same configuration on both sides while migrating. Remove the
> > > configuration validation code at e1000e_post_load, and the
> > > unnecessary subsys_used/subsys_ven_used fields.
> >
> > Migration with different subsys/subsys_ven may have a
> > really cumbersome consequences that are very hard to debug,
> > so I believe such a verification may save a lot of time,
> > however it’s a matter of convention.
>
> The same issues apply to almost every other property on every
> other device. But the convention is to not expect devices to
> validate configuration changes on migration.
>
> (It would be nice to have a more generic mechanism that detects
> configuration mismatch on migration, though. Having each device
> manually checking each of its properties wouldn't work).
Without knowing the e1000e code, isn't the easy way to do this
to change the:
VMSTATE_UINT16(subsys, E1000EState),
VMSTATE_UINT16(subsys_ven, E1000EState),
to
VMSTATE_UINT16_EQUAL(subsys, E1000EState),
VMSTATE_UINT16_EQUAL(subsys_ven, E1000EState),
and the migration code will flag if they don't match for you.
Dave
>
> --
> Eduardo
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 19:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] e1000e: QOM property & configuration cleanups Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-26 19:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] e1000e: Use regular DEFINE_PROP_<type> macros for properties Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-27 3:12 ` Jason Wang
2016-10-27 6:38 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2016-10-27 11:25 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-27 15:13 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-10-27 16:39 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-26 19:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] e1000e: No need to validate configuration on migration Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-27 6:42 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2016-10-27 11:39 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-27 12:22 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2016-10-27 14:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-26 19:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] e1000e: Rename "disable_vnet_hdr" property to "vnet" Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-27 6:47 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2016-10-26 19:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] e1000e: Rename "subsys_ven" property to "subsys-vendor" Eduardo Habkost
2016-10-27 6:45 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2016-10-27 11:30 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161027122228.GC2033@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry@daynix.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).