Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/6] iotests: throw away test timings if args change

["Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:28:23PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.09.2016 um 16:39 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:38:33AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 09/20/2016 09:15 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > >>> I guess we could keep things simple by not inventing a new format,
> > > >>> but instead of using 'check.time', use 'check.time.$FORMAT-$PROTOCOL'
> > > >>> eg 'check.time.qcow2-file'
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems more palatable. Lots of files rather than lots of lines in a
> > > >> single file; searching is now fast (if you can come up with the right
> > > >> file name, the OS does the searching for you rather than us having to
> > > >> figure out which (if any) portion of a large file applies).  We may
> > > >> still want a command for easily cleaning everything, and if we do switch
> > > >> to new file names, we'll still want to clean up the old files.
> > > > 
> > > > Isn't that command called 'git clean -f'  - if we remove 'check.time'
> > > > from the gitignore file, it'll be deleted by a git clean, without
> > > > needing to ass the -i flag. I don't think we really need to reinvent
> > > > a special way to clean just these timing files, particularly since
> > > > they are not large.
> > > 
> > > I'd still rather have the gitignore file ignore anything that we don't
> > > want to check into the tree (I'm a big fan of 'git add -a .', and hate
> > > it when non-ignored generated files interfere with that; yes I know I
> > > can munge .git/info/exclude locally, but it feels cleaner when generated
> > > files are ignored at the project level).
> > > 
> > > But yes, relying on git to do the cleanup is fine from my point of view.
> > 
> > NB, I'd still suggest ignoring check.time-$FORMAT-BACKEND files since
> > those are current. I was just refering to removal of the legacy check.time
> > file so next git cleanup kills the obsolete file
> 
> Was there a v2 of this series that I missed or was it just forgotten?

I never got around to sending a v2


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|