From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3tSO-0007lO-D2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:36:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3tSJ-0007JO-F0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:36:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3tSJ-0007J1-9z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:35:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:35:49 -0500 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20161107233549.GA2793@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1478502595-8484-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1478502595-8484-6-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1478502595-8484-6-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 05/10] intel_iommu: support device iotlb descriptor List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jason Wang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, wexu@redhat.com, vkaplans@redhat.com, Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:09:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: [...] > +static bool vtd_process_device_iotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s, > + VTDInvDesc *inv_desc) > +{ > + VTDAddressSpace *vtd_dev_as; > + IOMMUTLBEntry entry; Since "entry" is allocated on the stack... [...] > + entry.target_as = &vtd_dev_as->as; > + entry.addr_mask = sz - 1; > + entry.iova = addr; > + memory_region_notify_iommu(entry.target_as->root, entry); ... here we need to assign entry.perm explicitly to IOMMU_NONE, right? Also I think it'll be nice that we set all the fields even not used, to avoid rubbish from the stack passed down to notifier handlers. [...] > +static bool x86_iommu_device_iotlb_prop_get(Object *o, Error **errp) > +{ > + X86IOMMUState *s = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(o); > + return s->dt_supported; > +} > + > +static void x86_iommu_device_iotlb_prop_set(Object *o, bool value, Error **errp) > +{ > + X86IOMMUState *s = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(o); > + s->dt_supported = value; > +} > + > static void x86_iommu_instance_init(Object *o) > { > X86IOMMUState *s = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(o); > @@ -114,6 +126,11 @@ static void x86_iommu_instance_init(Object *o) > s->intr_supported = false; > object_property_add_bool(o, "intremap", x86_iommu_intremap_prop_get, > x86_iommu_intremap_prop_set, NULL); > + s->dt_supported = false; > + object_property_add_bool(o, "device-iotlb", > + x86_iommu_device_iotlb_prop_get, > + x86_iommu_device_iotlb_prop_set, > + NULL); Again, a nit-pick here is to use Property for "device-iotlb": static Property vtd_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("device-iotlb", X86IOMMUState, dt_supported, false), DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(), }; However not worth a repost. Thanks, -- peterx