From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3vaM-0000ME-9d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:52:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3vaJ-0003xl-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:52:26 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3vaJ-0003xZ-2w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:52:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:52:19 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20161108015219.GB18726@lemon> References: <1477723631-8700-1-git-send-email-ashish.mittal@veritas.com> <20161104130440.GA23691@stefanha-x1.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] This patch adds support for a new block device type called "vxhs". List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: ashish mittal Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Kevin Wolf , Venkatesha.Mg@veritas.com, Ashish Mittal , Jeff Cody , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Rakesh Ranjan , Markus Armbruster , Ketan.Nilangekar@veritas.com, Abhijit.Dey@veritas.com, Paolo Bonzini , Buddhi.Madhav@veritas.com On Mon, 11/07 17:39, ashish mittal wrote: > I guess the email subject of the individual patches is OK to > change? Yes, that is fine, as long as it doesn't burden incremental reviewing unnecessarily. Fam