qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/2] numa: make -numa parser dynamically allocate CPUs masks
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:36:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161118093621.6ecc91df@nial.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161116170826.GR5057@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:08:26 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > so it won't impose an additional limits on max_cpus limits
> > supported by different targets.
> > 
> > It removes global MAX_CPUMASK_BITS constant and need to
> > bump it up whenever max_cpus is being increased for
> > a target above MAX_CPUMASK_BITS value.
> > 
> > Use runtime max_cpus value instead to allocate sufficiently
> > sized node_cpu bitmasks in numa parser.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/sysemu/numa.h   |  2 +-
> >  include/sysemu/sysemu.h |  7 -------
> >  numa.c                  | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> >  vl.c                    |  5 -----
> >  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/sysemu/numa.h b/include/sysemu/numa.h
> > index 4da808a..8f09dcf 100644
> > --- a/include/sysemu/numa.h
> > +++ b/include/sysemu/numa.h
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct numa_addr_range {
> >  
> >  typedef struct node_info {
> >      uint64_t node_mem;
> > -    DECLARE_BITMAP(node_cpu, MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> > +    unsigned long *node_cpu;
> >      struct HostMemoryBackend *node_memdev;
> >      bool present;
> >      QLIST_HEAD(, numa_addr_range) addr; /* List to store address ranges */
> > diff --git a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> > index 66c6f15..cccde56 100644
> > --- a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> > +++ b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> > @@ -168,13 +168,6 @@ extern int mem_prealloc;
> >  #define MAX_NODES 128
> >  #define NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED MAX_NODES
> >  
> > -/* The following shall be true for all CPUs:
> > - *   cpu->cpu_index < max_cpus <= MAX_CPUMASK_BITS
> > - *
> > - * Note that cpu->get_arch_id() may be larger than MAX_CPUMASK_BITS.
> > - */
> > -#define MAX_CPUMASK_BITS 288
> > -  
> 
> Nice!
> 
> >  #define MAX_OPTION_ROMS 16
> >  typedef struct QEMUOptionRom {
> >      const char *name;
> > diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> > index 9c09e45..5542e40 100644
> > --- a/numa.c
> > +++ b/numa.c
> > @@ -266,20 +266,20 @@ static char *enumerate_cpus(unsigned long *cpus, int max_cpus)
> >  static void validate_numa_cpus(void)
> >  {
> >      int i;
> > -    DECLARE_BITMAP(seen_cpus, MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> > +    unsigned long *seen_cpus = bitmap_new(max_cpus);
> >  
> > -    bitmap_zero(seen_cpus, MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> > +    bitmap_zero(seen_cpus, max_cpus);  
> 
> bitmap_new() already returns a zeroed bitmap.
> 
> >      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
> > -        if (bitmap_intersects(seen_cpus, numa_info[i].node_cpu,
> > -                              MAX_CPUMASK_BITS)) {
> > +        if (bitmap_intersects(seen_cpus, numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus)) {
> >              bitmap_and(seen_cpus, seen_cpus,
> > -                       numa_info[i].node_cpu, MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> > +                       numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus);
> >              error_report("CPU(s) present in multiple NUMA nodes: %s",
> >                           enumerate_cpus(seen_cpus, max_cpus));
> > +            bitmap_free(seen_cpus);
> >              exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >          }
> >          bitmap_or(seen_cpus, seen_cpus,
> > -                  numa_info[i].node_cpu, MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> > +                  numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus);
> >      }
> >  
> >      if (!bitmap_full(seen_cpus, max_cpus)) {
> > @@ -291,12 +291,17 @@ static void validate_numa_cpus(void)
> >                       "in NUMA config");
> >          g_free(msg);
> >      }
> > +    bitmap_free(seen_cpus);  
> 
> See comment about bitmap_free() on patch 1/2. I think g_free() is
> good enough (unless you really want to review all callers of
> bitmap_[try_]new()).
ok, I'll replace bitmap_free() with g_free() and respin.

> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  void parse_numa_opts(MachineClass *mc)
> >  {
> >      int i;
> >  
> > +    for (i = 0; i < MAX_NODES; i++) {
> > +        numa_info[i].node_cpu = bitmap_new(max_cpus);
> > +    }
> > +
> >      if (qemu_opts_foreach(qemu_find_opts("numa"), parse_numa, NULL, NULL)) {
> >          exit(1);
> >      }
> > @@ -362,7 +367,7 @@ void parse_numa_opts(MachineClass *mc)
> >          numa_set_mem_ranges();
> >  
> >          for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
> > -            if (!bitmap_empty(numa_info[i].node_cpu, MAX_CPUMASK_BITS)) {
> > +            if (!bitmap_empty(numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus)) {
> >                  break;
> >              }
> >          }
> > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> > index d77dd86..37790e5 100644
> > --- a/vl.c
> > +++ b/vl.c
> > @@ -1277,11 +1277,6 @@ static void smp_parse(QemuOpts *opts)
> >  
> >          max_cpus = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "maxcpus", cpus);
> >  
> > -        if (max_cpus > MAX_CPUMASK_BITS) {
> > -            error_report("unsupported number of maxcpus");
> > -            exit(1);
> > -        }
> > -
> >          if (max_cpus < cpus) {
> >              error_report("maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
> >              exit(1);
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> >   
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-18  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 16:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/2] numa: allocate CPUs masks dynamically Igor Mammedov
2016-11-16 16:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/2] add bitmap_free() wrapper Igor Mammedov
2016-11-16 17:05   ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-16 16:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/2] numa: make -numa parser dynamically allocate CPUs masks Igor Mammedov
2016-11-16 17:08   ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-18  8:36     ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2016-11-17  6:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/2] numa: allocate CPUs masks dynamically Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-11-21 18:46   ` Greg Kurz
2016-11-22  3:05     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161118093621.6ecc91df@nial.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).