[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[BALATON Zoltan]

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

It's currently broken as it uses an incorrect shift, it tries
to use the slot number but uses the top bits of the bus number
instead.

Note: Neither implementation matches what OpenBIOS ends up putting
in the device-tree either, which will have to be fixed separately.

This is not quite correct for modelling a real Mac since Apple
tend to tie all 4 interrupt lines of a slot together and have
separate interrupts for every slot and every motherboard devices
going straight to the PIC but we'll sort that out later.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 hw/pci-host/uninorth.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

This needs a corresponding fix in OpenBIOS but this has to be
committed first for that. As this is already broken making this change
should not make things worse as they are now. Could we get this in now
as a bugfix commit?

diff --git a/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c b/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
index 7aac4d6..df342ac 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
@@ -62,9 +62,7 @@ typedef struct UNINState {
 
 static int pci_unin_map_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int irq_num)
 {
-    int devfn = pci_dev->devfn & 0x00FFFFFF;
-
-    return (((devfn >> 11) & 0x1F) + irq_num) & 3;
+    return (irq_num + (pci_dev->devfn >> 3)) & 3;
 }
 
 static void pci_unin_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level)
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[Thomas Huth]

On 20.11.2016 15:12, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> It's currently broken as it uses an incorrect shift, it tries
> to use the slot number but uses the top bits of the bus number
> instead.
> 
> Note: Neither implementation matches what OpenBIOS ends up putting
> in the device-tree either, which will have to be fixed separately.
> 
> This is not quite correct for modelling a real Mac since Apple
> tend to tie all 4 interrupt lines of a slot together and have
> separate interrupts for every slot and every motherboard devices
> going straight to the PIC but we'll sort that out later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>  hw/pci-host/uninorth.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> This needs a corresponding fix in OpenBIOS but this has to be
> committed first for that. As this is already broken making this change
> should not make things worse as they are now. Could we get this in now
> as a bugfix commit?
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c b/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
> index 7aac4d6..df342ac 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
> @@ -62,9 +62,7 @@ typedef struct UNINState {
>  
>  static int pci_unin_map_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int irq_num)
>  {
> -    int devfn = pci_dev->devfn & 0x00FFFFFF;
> -
> -    return (((devfn >> 11) & 0x1F) + irq_num) & 3;
> +    return (irq_num + (pci_dev->devfn >> 3)) & 3;
>  }
>  
>  static void pci_unin_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level)
> 

Looks reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[David Gibson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1843 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:12:31AM +1000, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> It's currently broken as it uses an incorrect shift, it tries
> to use the slot number but uses the top bits of the bus number
> instead.
> 
> Note: Neither implementation matches what OpenBIOS ends up putting
> in the device-tree either, which will have to be fixed separately.
> 
> This is not quite correct for modelling a real Mac since Apple
> tend to tie all 4 interrupt lines of a slot together and have
> separate interrupts for every slot and every motherboard devices
> going straight to the PIC but we'll sort that out later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>  hw/pci-host/uninorth.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> This needs a corresponding fix in OpenBIOS but this has to be
> committed first for that. As this is already broken making this change
> should not make things worse as they are now. Could we get this in now
> as a bugfix commit?

Applied to ppc-for-2.8.

> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c b/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
> index 7aac4d6..df342ac 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-host/uninorth.c
> @@ -62,9 +62,7 @@ typedef struct UNINState {
>  
>  static int pci_unin_map_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int irq_num)
>  {
> -    int devfn = pci_dev->devfn & 0x00FFFFFF;
> -
> -    return (((devfn >> 11) & 0x1F) + irq_num) & 3;
> +    return (irq_num + (pci_dev->devfn >> 3)) & 3;
>  }
>  
>  static void pci_unin_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level)

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

On 21/11/16 23:05, David Gibson wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:12:31AM +1000, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>>
>> It's currently broken as it uses an incorrect shift, it tries
>> to use the slot number but uses the top bits of the bus number
>> instead.
>>
>> Note: Neither implementation matches what OpenBIOS ends up putting
>> in the device-tree either, which will have to be fixed separately.
>>
>> This is not quite correct for modelling a real Mac since Apple
>> tend to tie all 4 interrupt lines of a slot together and have
>> separate interrupts for every slot and every motherboard devices
>> going straight to the PIC but we'll sort that out later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> ---
>>  hw/pci-host/uninorth.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> This needs a corresponding fix in OpenBIOS but this has to be
>> committed first for that. As this is already broken making this change
>> should not make things worse as they are now. Could we get this in now
>> as a bugfix commit?
> 
> Applied to ppc-for-2.8.

Is this going in for 2.8? If so, I'll need to apply the corresponding
patch to OpenBIOS to match and also do a PPC testing cycle to make sure
that there are no regressions on other OSs. Plus it would be useful to
get both pull requests in close proximity as this will break bisection.


ATB,

Mark.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[BALATON Zoltan]

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 21/11/16 23:05, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:12:31AM +1000, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>>>
>>> It's currently broken as it uses an incorrect shift, it tries
>>> to use the slot number but uses the top bits of the bus number
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> Note: Neither implementation matches what OpenBIOS ends up putting
>>> in the device-tree either, which will have to be fixed separately.
>>>
>>> This is not quite correct for modelling a real Mac since Apple
>>> tend to tie all 4 interrupt lines of a slot together and have
>>> separate interrupts for every slot and every motherboard devices
>>> going straight to the PIC but we'll sort that out later.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/pci-host/uninorth.c | 4 +---
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> This needs a corresponding fix in OpenBIOS but this has to be
>>> committed first for that. As this is already broken making this change
>>> should not make things worse as they are now. Could we get this in now
>>> as a bugfix commit?
>>
>> Applied to ppc-for-2.8.
>
> Is this going in for 2.8? If so, I'll need to apply the corresponding
> patch to OpenBIOS to match and also do a PPC testing cycle to make sure
> that there are no regressions on other OSs. Plus it would be useful to
> get both pull requests in close proximity as this will break bisection.

(Adding BenH as these are his patches I just apparently forgot the cc.)

I'd appreciate if this could get in 2.8. As this is a bugfix this should 
be OK during the freeze. Likely there will be more rc cycles where it 
could be reverted if found to cause problems. But since it's already 
broken, applying this patch to QEMU should not break it more and adding 
the fix on the OpenBIOS side (patch 4/4) would complete the fix and may
actually make it work. This should only affect mac99 and this one patch is 
independent from the other three I've sent to OpenBIOS so this could be 
applied independently to get at least the interrupts fixed  if you can't 
test and apply the other three until the next pull.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 02:34 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > Is this going in for 2.8? If so, I'll need to apply the corresponding
> > patch to OpenBIOS to match and also do a PPC testing cycle to make sure
> > that there are no regressions on other OSs. Plus it would be useful to
> > get both pull requests in close proximity as this will break bisection.
> 
> (Adding BenH as these are his patches I just apparently forgot the cc.)
> 
> I'd appreciate if this could get in 2.8. As this is a bugfix this should 
> be OK during the freeze. Likely there will be more rc cycles where it 
> could be reverted if found to cause problems. But since it's already 
> broken, applying this patch to QEMU should not break it more and adding 
> the fix on the OpenBIOS side (patch 4/4) would complete the fix and may
> actually make it work. This should only affect mac99 and this one patch is 
> independent from the other three I've sent to OpenBIOS so this could be 
> applied independently to get at least the interrupts fixed  if you can't 
> test and apply the other three until the next pull.

Right, PCI IRQs are terminally broken already. This patch without the
OpenBIOS change won't hurt. With the OpenBIOS change, things start
working better :-)

I appologize for being basically MIA these days, way too busy with
other things. Feel free to pick up ownership of my patches if you
want to get them into upstreamable state, such as the SunGEM one.

I don't know if I'll have any bandwidth to work on that stuff again
until later next year.

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle

[G 3]

On Nov 22, 2016, at 2:45 AM, qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org wrote:

> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:50:04 +1100
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> To: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>, Mark Cave-Ayland
> 	<mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
> 	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc: Make uninorth
> 	interrupt swizzling identical to Grackle
> Message-ID: <1479783004.10230.57.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 02:34 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> Is this going in for 2.8? If so, I'll need to apply the  
>>> corresponding
>>> patch to OpenBIOS to match and also do a PPC testing cycle to  
>>> make sure
>>> that there are no regressions on other OSs. Plus it would be  
>>> useful to
>>> get both pull requests in close proximity as this will break  
>>> bisection.
>>
>> (Adding BenH as these are his patches I just apparently forgot the  
>> cc.)
>>
>> I'd appreciate if this could get in 2.8. As this is a bugfix this  
>> should?
>> be OK during the freeze. Likely there will be more rc cycles where  
>> it?
>> could be reverted if found to cause problems. But since it's already?
>> broken, applying this patch to QEMU should not break it more and  
>> adding?
>> the fix on the OpenBIOS side (patch 4/4) would complete the fix  
>> and may
>> actually make it work. This should only affect mac99 and this one  
>> patch is?
>> independent from the other three I've sent to OpenBIOS so this  
>> could be?
>> applied independently to get at least the interrupts fixed? if you  
>> can't?
>> test and apply the other three until the next pull.
>
> Right, PCI IRQs are terminally broken already. This patch without the
> OpenBIOS change won't hurt. With the OpenBIOS change, things start
> working better :-)
>
> I appologize for being basically MIA these days, way too busy with
> other things. Feel free to pick up ownership of my patches if you
> want to get them into upstreamable state, such as the SunGEM one.
>
> I don't know if I'll have any bandwidth to work on that stuff again
> until later next year.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.

Can someone else take over the vga bios repo also?