From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rules.mak: Use -r instead of -Wl, -r to fix building when PIE is default
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:33:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129093354.GF5152@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <460f994a-fe47-1d1e-0d26-1220d8a05256@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:42:54PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 28/11/2016 16:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 28/11/2016 16:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:05:33PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 27/11/2016 17:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >>>> Building qemu fails in distributions where gcc enables PIE
> >>>> by default (e.g. Debian unstable) with:
> >>>> /usr/bin/ld: -r and -pie may not be used together
> >>>>
> >>>> -r and -pie cannot be used together in the linker,
> >>>> and position independent is already relocatable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Use -r instead of -Wl,-r to avoid gcc passing -r to the
> >>>> linker when PIE is enabled.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> >>>
> >>> I think this is a bug in the linker. If the linker is producing
> >>> relocatable objects by default, it has no reason to refuse -r. Have you
> >>> tried asking the binutils folks about it too?
> >>
> >> The linker knows nothing about this default, gcc is passing -pie
> >> to the linker.
> >
> > The linker is receiving "-r -pie". It can satisfy the requirement of
> > producing a relocatable object by discarding the "-r", but it doesn't.
> > That'd be a linker bug.
> >
> > But in fact ELF makes PIE ET_DYN and relocatable ET_REL. That would
> > make the linker error the right thing, but then I don't understand what
> > you mean by "position independent is already relocatable".
>
> Aha, I looked at GCC source code and this is incorrect: "Use -r instead
> of -Wl,-r to avoid gcc passing -r to the linker when PIE is enabled".
> When GCC sees -r (as opposed to -Wl,-r) it does not pass -pie to the linker.
Should we merge this patch for 2.8 with the commit updated to reflect this?
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-27 16:28 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rules.mak: Use -r instead of -Wl, -r to fix building when PIE is default Adrian Bunk
2016-11-28 15:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-28 15:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2016-11-28 15:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-28 15:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-28 19:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2016-11-29 9:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2016-11-29 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161129093354.GF5152@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).