From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux kernel polling for QEMU
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:45:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201114529.GA10441@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32e560b9-779a-3cd9-9320-2faf68e00107@scylladb.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1752 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:41:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 12:45 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:41:13PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 28/11/2016 16:29, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > Thanks for sharing the link. I'll let you know before embarking on an
> > > > effort to make epoll support busy_loop.
> > > >
> > > > At the moment I'm still evaluating whether the good results we've gotten
> > > > from polling in QEMU userspace are preserved when polling is shifted to
> > > > the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > FWIW I've prototyped ioctl(EVENTFD_SET_POLL_INFO) but haven't had a
> > > > chance to test it yet:
> > > > https://github.com/stefanha/linux/commit/133e8f1da8eb5364cd5c5f7162decbc79175cd13
> > > This would add a system call every time the main loop processes a vring,
> > > wouldn't it?
> > Yes, this is a problem and is the reason I haven't finished implementing
> > a test using QEMU yet.
> >
> > My proposed eventfd polling mechanism doesn't work well with descriptor
> > ring indices because the polling info needs to be updated each event
> > loop iteration with the last seen ring index.
> >
> > This can be solved by making struct eventfd_poll_info.value take a
> > userspace memory address. The value to compare against is fetched each
> > polling iteration, avoiding the need for ioctl calls.
> >
>
> Maybe we could do the same for sockets? When data is available on a socket
> (or when it becomes writable), write to a user memory location.
>
> I, too, have an interest in polling; in my situation most of the polling
> happens in userspace.
You are trying to improve on the latency of non-blocking
ppoll(2)/epoll_wait(2) call?
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 15:12 [Qemu-devel] Linux kernel polling for QEMU Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-28 9:31 ` Eliezer Tamir
2016-11-28 15:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-28 15:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-30 17:41 ` Avi Kivity
2016-12-01 11:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2016-12-01 11:59 ` Avi Kivity
2016-12-01 14:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-02 10:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-12-07 10:38 ` Avi Kivity
2016-12-07 10:32 ` Avi Kivity
2016-11-28 20:41 ` Willem de Bruijn
2016-11-29 8:19 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-11-29 11:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-29 11:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-11-29 10:32 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-29 11:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29 13:24 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-29 13:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29 14:17 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-29 15:24 ` Andrew Jones
2016-11-29 15:39 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-29 16:01 ` Andrew Jones
2016-11-29 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29 19:38 ` Andrew Jones
2016-11-30 7:19 ` Peter Maydell
2016-11-30 9:05 ` Andrew Jones
2016-11-30 9:46 ` Peter Maydell
2016-11-30 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-05 11:20 ` Alex Bennée
2016-11-29 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29 20:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-30 5:42 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-30 9:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-30 10:50 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-30 15:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161201114529.GA10441@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).