From: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: fix object_del for command-line-created objects
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:13:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201161318.1725.78309@loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161201123409.GA6700@work-vm>
Quoting Dr. David Alan Gilbert (2016-12-01 06:34:10)
> * Daniel P. Berrange (berrange@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:06:16PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > Currently objects specified on the command-line are only partially
> > > cleaned up when 'object_del' is issued in either HMP or QMP: the
> > > object itself is fully finalized, but the QemuOpts are not removed.
> > > This results in the following behavior:
> > >
> > > x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -monitor stdio \
> > > -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=256M
> > >
> > > QEMU 2.7.91 monitor - type 'help' for more information
> > > (qemu) object_del ram1
> > > (qemu) object_del ram1
> > > object 'ram1' not found
> > > (qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=256M
> > > Duplicate ID 'ram1' for object
> > > Try "help object_add" for more information
> > >
> > > which can be an issue for use-cases like memory hotplug.
> > >
> > > This happens on the HMP side because hmp_object_add() attempts to
> > > create a temporary QemuOpts entry with ID 'ram1', which ends up
> > > conflicting with the command-line-created entry, since it was never
> > > cleaned up during the previous hmp_object_del() call.
> > >
> > > We address this by adding checks in {qmp,hmp}_object_del to determine
> > > whether an option group entry matching the object's ID is present,
> > > and removing it if it is.
> > >
> > > Note that qmp_object_add() never attempts to create a temporary
> > > QemuOpts entry, so it does not encounter the duplicate ID error,
> > > which is why this isn't generally visible in libvirt.
> > >
> > > Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > hmp.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > qmp.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hmp.c b/hmp.c
> > > index b869617..99b8bf3 100644
> > > --- a/hmp.c
> > > +++ b/hmp.c
> > > @@ -2072,6 +2072,16 @@ void hmp_object_del(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
> > >
> > > user_creatable_del(id, &err);
> > > hmp_handle_error(mon, &err);
> > > +
> > > + /* if object was defined on the command-line, remove its corresponding
> > > + * option group entry
> > > + */
> > > + if (err == NULL) {
> > > + QemuOptsList *opt_group = qemu_find_opts_err("object", &err);
> > > + if (opt_group) {
> > > + qemu_opts_del(qemu_opts_find(opt_group, id));
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > void hmp_info_memdev(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
> > > diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c
> > > index 0028f0b..87c545d 100644
> > > --- a/qmp.c
> > > +++ b/qmp.c
> > > @@ -686,6 +686,16 @@ void qmp_object_add(const char *type, const char *id,
> > > void qmp_object_del(const char *id, Error **errp)
> > > {
> > > user_creatable_del(id, errp);
> > > +
> > > + /* if object was defined on the command-line, remove its corresponding
> > > + * option group entry
> > > + */
> > > + if (!(errp && *errp)) {
> > > + QemuOptsList *opt_group = qemu_find_opts_err("object", errp);
> > > + if (opt_group) {
> > > + qemu_opts_del(qemu_opts_find(opt_group, id));
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > }
> >
> > I rather feel like this code ought to be in user_creatable_del(), since
> > all code paths which call user_creatable_del() need to do deal with
> > this scenario.
>
> Yes that seems cleaner; the cleanup that's being done is not the result
> of either of the monitor's actions.
It was also for similar reasons that I was hesitant to put it in
user_creatable_del() :) Putting it higher up in the stack somehow felt
less icky, but given that they both violate encapsulation somewhat I
suppose it does makes sense to take the more practical/safer route and
put it in a common path. Will take this approach for v2.
>
> Dave
>
> > Also I'd like to see a unit test added that exposes this problem and
> > demonstrates the fix - could att it to tests/check-qom-proplist.c
> >
> > Regards,
> > Daniel
> > --
> > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
> > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 23:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: fix object_del for command-line-created objects Michael Roth
2016-12-01 2:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8] " Eric Blake
2016-12-01 16:09 ` Michael Roth
2016-12-01 9:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] " Daniel P. Berrange
2016-12-01 12:34 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-12-01 16:13 ` Michael Roth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161201161318.1725.78309@loki \
--to=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).