From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: 赵小强 <zxq_yx_007@163.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] QOM'ify work for ppc
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:28:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105012813.GC13763@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404AAC02-2CF3-4F5D-9A1B-2AEA2ADB462E@163.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2606 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 08:53:07AM +0800, 赵小强 wrote:
> Ok!
>
> Just one more comment:
> After check the code flow, It's clear that the initialized memory
> region must be add to address space by calling
> memory_region_add_subregion in platform code before it can be
> accessed.
Yes.. but I don't see how that's relevant to the discussion at hand.
>
> Best wishes !
>
> > 在 2017年1月5日,08:20,David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> 写道:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:04:02PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On 4 January 2017 at 03:28, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:02:21PM +0800, 赵小强 wrote:
> >>>> Hi,david:
> >>>>
> >>>> To my understanding,what must be put in the realize function is
> >>>> code which depends on property values. What's the benefit of
> >>>> moving memory region initialization into realize function? I can
> >>>> not figure out, can you make some explanations?
> >>>
> >>> If nothing else it's better in realize() for consistency with other
> >>> devices.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure we're terribly consistent at all, really. My understanding
> >> was about the same as 赵小强 -- put stuff in init unless it has to
> >> go in realize because it depends on properties or might fail or
> >> has permanent effects on the simulation.
> >> Lots of existing devices do memory_region_init* calls in
> >> their init functions.
> >> We should probably write down our preferences somewhere, perhaps
> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/QOMConventions
> >>
> >>> I'm not familiar enough with the details to be sure, but I also think
> >>> it's not safe in instance_init. Once memory regions are registered,
> >>> the device can potentially interact with other devices in the virtual
> >>> machine. realize() is sequenced to expect that, instance_init is not.
> >>
> >> Hmm, that doesn't sound right to me. The other devices will only
> >> interact with the memory regions when the calling code has
> >> finished doing the create/realize/map memory regions sequence --
> >> an MR on its own doesn't do anything unless somebody maps it into
> >> an address space.
> >
> > Huh. Ok, I guess I was wrong.
> >
> > Alright, 赵小强, feel free to repost addressing just the other
> > comments and I'll merge.
> >
>
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-31 1:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] QOM'ify work for ppc xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31 1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] hw/gpio: QOM'ify mpc8xxx.c xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31 1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] hw/ppc: QOM'ify e500.c xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31 1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] hw/ppc: QOM'ify ppce500_spin.c xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31 1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] hw/ppc: QOM'ify spapr_vio.c xiaoqiang zhao
2017-01-02 22:28 ` David Gibson
2017-01-02 22:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] QOM'ify work for ppc David Gibson
2017-01-03 14:02 ` 赵小强
2017-01-04 3:28 ` David Gibson
2017-01-04 13:59 ` 赵小强
2017-01-04 17:04 ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-05 0:20 ` David Gibson
2017-01-05 0:53 ` 赵小强
2017-01-05 1:28 ` David Gibson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170105012813.GC13763@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=zxq_yx_007@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).