qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: 赵小强 <zxq_yx_007@163.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] QOM'ify work for ppc
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:28:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105012813.GC13763@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404AAC02-2CF3-4F5D-9A1B-2AEA2ADB462E@163.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2606 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 08:53:07AM +0800, 赵小强 wrote:
> Ok!
> 
> Just one more comment:
> After check the code flow, It's clear that the initialized memory
> region must be add to address space by calling
> memory_region_add_subregion in platform code before it can be
> accessed.

Yes.. but I don't see how that's relevant to the discussion at hand.

> 
> Best wishes !
> 
> > 在 2017年1月5日,08:20,David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> 写道:
> > 
> >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:04:02PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On 4 January 2017 at 03:28, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:02:21PM +0800, 赵小强 wrote:
> >>>> Hi,david:
> >>>> 
> >>>>   To my understanding,what must be put in the realize function  is
> >>>>   code which depends on property values. What's the benefit of
> >>>>   moving memory region initialization into realize function?  I can
> >>>>   not figure out, can you make some explanations?
> >>> 
> >>> If nothing else it's better in realize() for consistency with other
> >>> devices.
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure we're terribly consistent at all, really. My understanding
> >> was about the same as 赵小强 -- put stuff in init unless it has to
> >> go in realize because it depends on properties or might fail or
> >> has permanent effects on the simulation.
> >> Lots of existing devices do memory_region_init* calls in
> >> their init functions.
> >> We should probably write down our preferences somewhere, perhaps
> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/QOMConventions
> >> 
> >>> I'm not familiar enough with the details to be sure, but I also think
> >>> it's not safe in instance_init.  Once memory regions are registered,
> >>> the device can potentially interact with other devices in the virtual
> >>> machine.  realize() is sequenced to expect that, instance_init is not.
> >> 
> >> Hmm, that doesn't sound right to me. The other devices will only
> >> interact with the memory regions when the calling code has
> >> finished doing the create/realize/map memory regions sequence --
> >> an MR on its own doesn't do anything unless somebody maps it into
> >> an address space.
> > 
> > Huh.  Ok, I guess I was wrong.
> > 
> > Alright, 赵小强, feel free to repost addressing just the other
> > comments and I'll merge.
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-31  1:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] QOM'ify work for ppc xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31  1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] hw/gpio: QOM'ify mpc8xxx.c xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31  1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] hw/ppc: QOM'ify e500.c xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31  1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] hw/ppc: QOM'ify ppce500_spin.c xiaoqiang zhao
2016-12-31  1:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] hw/ppc: QOM'ify spapr_vio.c xiaoqiang zhao
2017-01-02 22:28   ` David Gibson
2017-01-02 22:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] QOM'ify work for ppc David Gibson
2017-01-03 14:02   ` 赵小强
2017-01-04  3:28     ` David Gibson
2017-01-04 13:59       ` 赵小强
2017-01-04 17:04       ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-05  0:20         ` David Gibson
2017-01-05  0:53           ` 赵小强
2017-01-05  1:28             ` David Gibson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170105012813.GC13763@umbus.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zxq_yx_007@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).