From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSEZf-0006bI-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 22:00:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSEZa-000465-Gn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 22:00:11 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSEZa-00045m-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 22:00:06 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:59:58 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20170114025958.GA14805@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1484276800-26814-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <20170113175646-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170113175646-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 00/14] VT-d: vfio enablement and misc enhances List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, tianyu.lan@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, jasowang@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, bd.aviv@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 05:58:02PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:06:26AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > v3: > > - fix style error reported by patchew > > - fix comment in domain switch patch: use "IOMMU address space" rather > > than "IOMMU region" [Kevin] > > - add ack-by for Paolo in patch: > > "memory: add section range info for IOMMU notifier" > > (this is seperately collected besides this thread) > > - remove 3 patches which are merged already (from Jason) > > - rebase to master b6c0897 > > So 1-6 look like nice cleanups to me. Should I merge them now? That'll be great if you'd like to merge them. Then I can further shorten this series for the next post. Regarding to the error_report() issue that Jason has mentioned, I can touch them up in the future when needed - after all, most of the patch content are about converting DPRINT()s into traces. Thanks! -- peterx