From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTshi-0002JW-Jy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:03:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTshd-00074O-EC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:03:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60444) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTshd-00074C-87 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:03:13 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DF0745DB7 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:03:08 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20170118160308.GC2085@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] kvmclock in wrong compat macro? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: mtosatti@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Marcelo, In commit 6053a86 'kvmclock: reduce kvmclock differences on migration' you add a 'x-mach-use-reliable-get-clock' and a compatibility entry that turns it off; if I'm reading it right though it got merged after 2.8.0 was released but the entry has gone into PC_COMPAT_2_7 where I guess it should have gone into PC_COMPAT_2_8. Also, why is it x86 specific? Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK