From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtgn-000479-0b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:06:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtgj-0004Ty-Qc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:06:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtgj-0004Tk-KW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:06:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:06:18 -0200 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20170118170618.GD3491@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> References: <148474442644.214.12638212197331646848@790289a7ca88> <21a27c35-8495-3b55-b809-5499118660b9@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21a27c35-8495-3b55-b809-5499118660b9@cn.fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] cpu: numa: Fix the mapping initialization of VCPUs and NUMA nodes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dou Liyang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, stefanha@redhat.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, imammedo@redhat.com, vilanova@ac.upc.edu On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:26:36PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote: > Hi, All > > > ** > > ERROR:/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/vhost-user-test.c:668:test_migrate: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(rsp, "return")) > > GTester: last random seed: R02Sf52546c4daff8087416f43fa7c146db8 > > ftruncate: Permission denied > > ftruncate: Permission denied > > qemu-system-aarch64: /tmp/qemu-test/src/qom/cpu.c:346: cpu_common_map_numa_node: Assertion `cpu->cpu_index < max_cpus' failed. > > Broken pipe > > I don't know What's the meaning of this log ? > > Is the qemu-system-aarch64 can't recognize the > qom/cpu.c:346: assert(cpu->cpu_index < max_cpus); This means the assert() line is being triggered for some reason, and cpu_index is >= max_cpus when we cpu_common_map_numa_node() gets called. We need to investigate why. -- Eduardo