From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50055) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoKC-0003Bz-7d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:59:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoK9-0002UT-53 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:59:08 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:36971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoK8-0002UE-S8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:59:05 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v0QHs9dX102989 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:59:03 -0500 Received: from e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.105]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 287m9yckmk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:59:03 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:59:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:58:57 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck In-Reply-To: <8ae107ad-0f3f-46ef-e734-2f88b14bad9a@redhat.com> References: <8ae107ad-0f3f-46ef-e734-2f88b14bad9a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20170126185857.6076de87.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu-devel] Poll on QEMU documentation project List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: G 3 , qemu-devel qemu-devel On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:30:46 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 26/01/2017 18:28, G 3 wrote: > > > > On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:00 PM, qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> as you may know I've been collecting some ideas about documentation for > >> QEMU at http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/Documentation. > >> > >> I've now prepared a poll to understand how familiars developers are with > >> various documentation tools. I've CCed people with most commits to QEMU > >> documentation, or with whom I have discussed about this before, but > >> everybody's opinion is of course welcome! > >> > >> The poll is hosted with Google Forms and you can fill it in at > >> https://goo.gl/Yfxj1M. If you hate Google Forms, contact me offlist and > >> I'll send you the questions by email (and remind you when I need someone > >> to review my patches). > >> > >> Paolo > >> > >> > >> tl;dr: poll is at https://goo.gl/Yfxj1M > > > > > > For this question: > > What's your opinion on the maintainability of the following > > documentation formats? > > > > Is it from 1(least maintainable) to 5 (most maintainable)? > > > > The survey looks good. I will take it. > > Yes, all of them are 1=bad 5=good. Ugh, so I had my answers the wrong way round :( Most of the surveys I did recently had the order the other way round... I'll send another form.