From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZUM3-0001xa-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 22:16:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZUM0-0004kw-LU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 22:16:07 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZUM0-0004kL-Cs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 22:16:04 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v133Drt9095529 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 22:16:01 -0500 Received: from e23smtp08.au.ibm.com (e23smtp08.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.141]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 28ccsu16r8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 22:16:01 -0500 Received: from localhost by e23smtp08.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:15:59 +1000 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 08:45:01 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1485504213-21632-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1485504213-21632-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20170203031501.GA12744@in.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] softfloat: Add round-to-odd rounding mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, rth@twiddle.net, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org Peter, On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:33:31PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > Changes in v2: > ------------- > - Do odd or even for the right precision bit in 64bit rounding. (Peter Maydell) > - Handle the overflow case correctly in 64bit rounding. (Peter Maydell) Does this version of round-to-odd implementation look correct now ? > - Add a patch to handle underflow case correctly in 64bit rounding. Does this fix for underflow case make sense ? Regards, Bharata.