qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Pradeep Jagadeesh <pradeepkiruvale@gmail.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>,
	Pradeep Jagadeesh <pradeep.jagadeesh@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 v16] fsdev: add IO throttle support to fsdev devices
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:29:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170207172933.05574f60@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b702369-7891-4e38-7240-57ad643657bd@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1917 bytes --]

Cc'ing Stefan who reviewed patch 2/2.

On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:56:08 -0600
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 02/07/2017 04:32 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not aware of anything related to fsdev in QMP... and libvirt seems to
> >> only parse the output of -help to guess fsdev capabilities.  
> > 
> > Oops, reading some more libvirt code I now see that libvirt doesn't parse
> > -help anymore with QEMU >= 1.2.0... sorry for the noise :)
> >   
> >> And indeed,
> >> qemu-options.hx doesn't expose this new feature.
> >>  
> >>> Please make sure we don't reach 2.9 with only a half-baked feature;
> >>> whether that means finishing the QMP work or temporarily disabling the
> >>> cli additions until a later release can finish the work.
> >>>     
> >>
> >> Would this be ok to add the missing bits in qemu-options.hx or do you
> >> expect more ?  
> 
> If it cannot be probed via QMP, then libvirt will most likely assume
> that it does not exist.  I guess we're okay having command line only in
> 2.9 if you can't get QMP working, because libvirt will just never drive
> the feature until 2.10 when QMP is available; but then we risk the
> command line subtly changing and breaking someone else that was using
> the command line without QMP.  Maybe the safest approach is to just use
> the 'x-' prefix to the command line portion, until the feature is complete.
> 

The semantics here are exactly the same as for block devices. The
command line options added to -fsdev are the very same already used
by -drive for years.

Patch 2/2 in this series even factors them out to a common header file
to be used by fsdev and blockdev. I really don't expect any modification
at all on the command line (nor the other people who reviewed that patch
obviously)... are you suggesting that we should put 2/2 on hold and
use the 'x-' prefix anyway ?

Cheers.

--
Greg

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-07 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-03 11:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v16] fsdev: add IO throttle support to fsdev devices Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 11:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 " Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 12:21   ` Alberto Garcia
2017-02-06 19:36   ` Eric Blake
2017-02-06 23:15     ` Greg Kurz
2017-02-07 10:32       ` Greg Kurz
2017-02-07 15:56         ` Eric Blake
2017-02-07 16:29           ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2017-02-14 13:21             ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-02-22 13:41               ` Greg Kurz
2017-02-22 16:01                 ` Eric Blake
2017-02-22 16:59                   ` Greg Kurz
2017-02-22 17:04                     ` Eric Blake
2017-02-07  6:18     ` Fam Zheng
2017-02-07 10:34     ` Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 11:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 v16] throttle: factor out duplicate code Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 12:22   ` Alberto Garcia
2017-02-03 12:27     ` Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 12:44       ` Alberto Garcia
2017-02-03 12:46         ` Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 12:53           ` Alberto Garcia
2017-02-03 12:57             ` Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-06 14:58   ` Greg Kurz
2017-02-06 15:19     ` Pradeep Jagadeesh
2017-02-03 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v16] fsdev: add IO throttle support to fsdev devices no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170207172933.05574f60@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=pradeep.jagadeesh@huawei.com \
    --cc=pradeepkiruvale@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).