From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbT7D-0003HK-IN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:21:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbT78-0003pJ-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:20:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:20:51 +0000 From: Stephane Chazelas Message-ID: <20170208142051.GB19518@chaz.gmail.com> References: <20170202123045.GA24714@chaz.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qcow2] how to avoid qemu doing lseek(SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE)? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Qemu-block , Kevin Wolf 2017-02-08 00:43:18 +0100, Max Reitz: [...] > Therefore, the patch as it is makes sense. The fact that said lseek() is > slow on ZFS is (in my humble opinion) the ZFS driver's problem that > needs to be fixed there. [...] For the record, I've mentioned the qemu performance implication at https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4306#issuecomment-277000682 Not much more I can do at that point. That issue was raised a year ago and has not been assigned any milestone yet. -- Stephane