From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdFSI-0005Aw-7z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:10:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdFSF-0002Vs-VY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:10:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:37104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdFSF-0002Ve-PQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:10:03 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id v77so91990253wmv.0 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:10:03 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:09:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20170213121017.12907-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20170213121017.12907-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> References: <20170213121017.12907-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 03/24] mttcg: Add missing tb_lock/unlock() in cpu_exec_step() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: peter.maydell@linaro.org, rth@twiddle.net Cc: mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, fred.konrad@greensocs.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com, cota@braap.org, bobby.prani@gmail.com, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, serge.fdrv@gmail.com, bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org, =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= , Peter Crosthwaite From: Pranith Kumar The recent patch enabling lock assertions uncovered the missing lock acquisition in cpu_exec_step(). This patch adds them. Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- cpu-exec.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c index 57583f16a0..97ff37eb73 100644 --- a/cpu-exec.c +++ b/cpu-exec.c @@ -233,14 +233,18 @@ static void cpu_exec_step(CPUState *cpu) uint32_t flags; cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, &pc, &cs_base, &flags); + tb_lock(); tb = tb_gen_code(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags, 1 | CF_NOCACHE | CF_IGNORE_ICOUNT); tb->orig_tb = NULL; + tb_unlock(); /* execute the generated code */ trace_exec_tb_nocache(tb, pc); cpu_tb_exec(cpu, tb); + tb_lock(); tb_phys_invalidate(tb, -1); tb_free(tb); + tb_unlock(); } void cpu_exec_step_atomic(CPUState *cpu) -- 2.11.0