From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: famz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] coroutine-lock: make CoRwlock thread-safe and fair
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:12:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213181244.16297-7-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170213181244.16297-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
This adds a CoMutex around the existing CoQueue. Because the write-side
can just take CoMutex, the old "writer" field is not necessary anymore.
Instead of removing it altogether, count the number of pending writers
during a read-side critical section and forbid further readers from
entering.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
include/qemu/coroutine.h | 3 ++-
util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/coroutine.h b/include/qemu/coroutine.h
index d2de268..e60beaf 100644
--- a/include/qemu/coroutine.h
+++ b/include/qemu/coroutine.h
@@ -204,8 +204,9 @@ bool qemu_co_queue_empty(CoQueue *queue);
typedef struct CoRwlock {
- bool writer;
+ int pending_writer;
int reader;
+ CoMutex mutex;
CoQueue queue;
} CoRwlock;
diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
index b0a554f..6328eed 100644
--- a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
+++ b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
@@ -346,16 +346,22 @@ void qemu_co_rwlock_init(CoRwlock *lock)
{
memset(lock, 0, sizeof(*lock));
qemu_co_queue_init(&lock->queue);
+ qemu_co_mutex_init(&lock->mutex);
}
void qemu_co_rwlock_rdlock(CoRwlock *lock)
{
Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
- while (lock->writer) {
- qemu_co_queue_wait(&lock->queue, NULL);
+ qemu_co_mutex_lock(&lock->mutex);
+ /* For fairness, wait if a writer is in line. */
+ while (lock->pending_writer) {
+ qemu_co_queue_wait(&lock->queue, &lock->mutex);
}
lock->reader++;
+ qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&lock->mutex);
+
+ /* The rest of the read-side critical section is run without the mutex. */
self->locks_held++;
}
@@ -364,10 +370,13 @@ void qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(CoRwlock *lock)
Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
assert(qemu_in_coroutine());
- if (lock->writer) {
- lock->writer = false;
+ if (!lock->reader) {
+ /* The critical section started in qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock. */
qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&lock->queue);
} else {
+ self->locks_held--;
+
+ qemu_co_mutex_lock(&lock->mutex);
lock->reader--;
assert(lock->reader >= 0);
/* Wakeup only one waiting writer */
@@ -375,16 +384,20 @@ void qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(CoRwlock *lock)
qemu_co_queue_next(&lock->queue);
}
}
- self->locks_held--;
+ qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&lock->mutex);
}
void qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock(CoRwlock *lock)
{
- Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
-
- while (lock->writer || lock->reader) {
- qemu_co_queue_wait(&lock->queue, NULL);
+ qemu_co_mutex_lock(&lock->mutex);
+ lock->pending_writer++;
+ while (lock->reader) {
+ qemu_co_queue_wait(&lock->queue, &lock->mutex);
}
- lock->writer = true;
- self->locks_held++;
+ lock->pending_writer--;
+
+ /* The rest of the write-side critical section is run with
+ * the mutex taken, so that lock->reader remains zero.
+ * There is no need to update self->locks_held.
+ */
}
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 18:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Make CoMutex/CoQueue/CoRwlock thread-safe Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-13 18:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] coroutine-lock: make CoMutex thread-safe Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-16 16:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-02-13 18:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] coroutine-lock: add limited spinning to CoMutex Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-16 16:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-02-13 18:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] test-aio-multithread: add performance comparison with thread-based mutexes Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-13 18:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] coroutine-lock: place CoMutex before CoQueue in header Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-13 18:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] coroutine-lock: add mutex argument to CoQueue APIs Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-13 18:12 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-02-15 9:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] coroutine-lock: make CoRwlock thread-safe and fair Fam Zheng
2017-02-15 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-15 11:37 ` Fam Zheng
2017-02-15 9:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Make CoMutex/CoQueue/CoRwlock thread-safe Fam Zheng
2017-02-16 17:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213181244.16297-7-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).