From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
jcody@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
den@openvz.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] backup: allow target without .bdrv_get_info
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:02:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170215170212.GI4935@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487170693-28224-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Am 15.02.2017 um 15:58 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> Currently backup to nbd target is broken, as nbd doesn't have
> .bdrv_get_info realization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>
> v3: fix compilation (I feel like an idiot)
> adjust wording (Fam)
>
> v2: add WARNING
>
> ===
>
> Since commit
>
> commit 4c9bca7e39a6e07ad02c1dcde3478363344ec60b
> Author: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu Feb 25 15:58:30 2016 -0500
>
> block/backup: avoid copying less than full target clusters
>
> backup to nbd target is broken, we have "Couldn't determine the cluster size of
> the target image".
>
> Proposed NBD protocol extension - NBD_OPT_INFO should finally solve this problem.
> But until it is not realized, we need allow backup to nbd target due to backward
> compatibility.
>
> Furthermore, is it entirely ok to disallow backup if bds lacks .bdrv_get_info?
> Which behavior should be default: to fail backup or to use default cluster size?
>
>
> block/backup.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index ea38733..d800a24 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,16 @@ BlockJob *backup_job_create(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
> * backup cluster size is smaller than the target cluster size. Even for
> * targets with a backing file, try to avoid COW if possible. */
> ret = bdrv_get_info(target, &bdi);
> - if (ret < 0 && !target->backing) {
> + if (ret == -ENOTSUP) {
> + /* Cluster size is not defined */
> + fprintf(stderr,
error_report() was better because with HMP, the message would appear in
the monitor (where the user is working) instead of stderr (where they
might easily miss the message).
If this means that you need to include another header file, just do
that.
> + "WARNING: Target block device doesn't provide information "
> + "about block size and it doesn't have backing file. Default "
> + "block size of %u bytes is used. If actual block size of "
> + "target exceeds this default, backup may be unusable",
This error message could use a few more articles. :-)
"WARNING: The target block device doesn't provide information "
"about the block size and it doesn't have a backing file. The default "
"block size of %u bytes is used. If the actual block size of "
"the target exceeds this default, the backup may be unusable",
> + BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE_DEFAULT);
> + job->cluster_size = BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE_DEFAULT;
> + } else if (ret < 0 && !target->backing) {
> error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> "Couldn't determine the cluster size of the target image, "
> "which has no backing file");
I'm not completely sure whether this is the right fix or whether it
would be better to address this is NBD, e.g. by adding an option where
you specify the block size when opening the NBD driver. (Later, when NBD
can communicate this, it would check if the option matches what the
server says and error out if it doesn't.)
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-15 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-15 14:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] backup: allow target without .bdrv_get_info Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-02-15 17:02 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2017-02-15 17:04 ` Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170215170212.GI4935@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).