From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: make ram device read/write endian sensitive
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:36:15 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170223233615.GA18157@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_BgiXrjW9aRNFkXEEjS+kjibJ_UisJtiLgrPh=0re5qA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:29:53PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 February 2017 at 15:21, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23/02/2017 15:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 23 February 2017 at 12:53, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 23/02/2017 13:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>>> On 23 February 2017 at 11:43, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 23/02/2017 12:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>>>>> We should probably update the doc comment to note that the
> >>>>>> pointer is to host-endianness memory (and that this is not
> >>>>>> like normal RAM which is target-endian)...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wouldn't call it host-endianness memory, and I disagree that normal
> >>>>> RAM is target-endian---in both cases it's just a bunch of bytes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, the access done by the MemoryRegionOps callbacks needs to match
> >>>>> the endianness declared by the MemoryRegionOps themselves.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, if the guest stores a bunch of integers to the memory, which
> >>>> way round do you see them when you look at the bunch of bytes?
> >>>
> >>> You see them in whatever endianness the guest used.
> >>
> >> I'm confused. I said "normal RAM and this ramdevice memory are
> >> different", and you seem to be saying they're the same. I don't
> >> think they are (in particular I think with a BE guest on an
> >> LE host they'll look different).
> >
> > No, they look entirely the same. The only difference is that they go
> > through MemoryRegionOps instead of memcpy.
>
> Then we have a different problem, because the thing this patch
> is claiming to fix is that the memory the device is backed by
> (from vfio) is little-endian and we're not accessing it right.
>
> RAM of the usual sort is target-endian (by which I mean "when the guest
> does a write of 32-bits 0x12345678, and you look at the memory byte
> by byte then the order of bytes is either 0x12 0x34 0x56 0x78 if
> TARGET_LITTLE_ENDIAN or 0x78 0x56 0x34 0x12 if TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN").
>
> AIUI what we want for this VFIO case is "when the guest does
> a 32-bit write of 0x12345678 then the bytes are 0x12 0x34 0x56 0x78
> regardless of whether TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN or not".
At least in the case of KVM and MMIO emulation (which is the case
here), run->mmio.data should be considered as a byte stream without
endianness, and what is needed is for QEMU to transfer data between
run->mmio.data and the device (or whatever is backing the MMIO region)
without any net byte swap.
So if QEMU is doing a 32-bit host-endian load from run->mmio.data
(for an MMIO store), then it needs to do a 32-bit host-endian store
into the device memory. In other words, the RAM memory region needs
to be considered host endian to match run->mmio.data being considered
host endian.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-23 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 6:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: make ram device read/write endian sensitive Yongji Xie
2017-02-21 16:21 ` Alex Williamson
2017-02-21 16:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-21 18:09 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-21 18:44 ` Alex Williamson
2017-02-22 7:54 ` Yongji Xie
2017-02-22 10:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-21 18:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-21 19:40 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 4:20 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-02-23 8:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 10:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 10:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 10:23 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 11:34 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 11:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 12:26 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 14:35 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 15:29 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 15:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 16:08 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-23 16:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 17:14 ` Yongji Xie
2017-02-24 3:28 ` David Gibson
2017-02-23 23:36 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2017-02-23 15:39 ` Alex Williamson
2017-02-23 15:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-23 16:08 ` Alex Williamson
2017-02-24 3:26 ` David Gibson
2017-02-23 11:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-02-27 2:25 ` Michael Roth
2017-02-27 3:25 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-02-27 4:28 ` Yongji Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170223233615.GA18157@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).