From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: guard vring access when setting notification
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170301174738-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170228152411.81609-1-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:24:11PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Switching to vring caches exposed an existing bug in
> virtio_queue_set_notification(): We can't access vring structures
> if they have not been set up yet. This may happen, for example,
> for virtio-blk devices with multiple queues: The code will try to
> switch notifiers for every queue, but the guest may have only set up
> a subset of them.
>
> Fix this by (1) guarding access to the vring memory by checking
> for vring.desc and (2) triggering an update to the vring flags
> for consistency with the configured notification state once the
> queue is actually configured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index e487e36..d2ecd64 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -284,10 +284,11 @@ static inline void vring_set_avail_event(VirtQueue *vq, uint16_t val)
> virtio_stw_phys_cached(vq->vdev, &caches->used, pa, val);
> }
>
> -void virtio_queue_set_notification(VirtQueue *vq, int enable)
> +static void vring_set_notification(VirtQueue *vq, int enable)
> {
> - vq->notification = enable;
> -
> + if (!vq->vring.desc) {
> + return;
> + }
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) {
> vring_set_avail_event(vq, vring_avail_idx(vq));
> @@ -303,6 +304,13 @@ void virtio_queue_set_notification(VirtQueue *vq, int enable)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +void virtio_queue_set_notification(VirtQueue *vq, int enable)
> +{
> + vq->notification = enable;
> +
> + vring_set_notification(vq, enable);
> +}
> +
> int virtio_queue_ready(VirtQueue *vq)
> {
> return vq->vring.avail != 0;
> @@ -1348,6 +1356,7 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr)
> {
> vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = addr;
> virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n);
> + vring_set_notification(&vdev->vq[n], vdev->vq[n].notification);
> }
>
> hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> @@ -1362,6 +1371,7 @@ void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
> vdev->vq[n].vring.avail = avail;
> vdev->vq[n].vring.used = used;
> virtio_init_region_cache(vdev, n);
> + vring_set_notification(&vdev->vq[n], vdev->vq[n].notification);
> }
>
> void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
There's a problem here, this violates the spec:
- for legacy devices, we shouldn't touch rings until we get a first kick
- for virtio 1 devices, we should not do it until DRIVER_OK
This is the real problem therefore: aio poll should not even
start before these events. Pls fix that and then you will not
need to call vring_set_notification from set rings.
> --
> 2.8.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-01 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 15:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: guard vring access when setting notification Cornelia Huck
2017-02-28 15:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-02-28 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-01 15:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-03-01 16:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-03-01 16:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-01 17:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-03-01 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-01 17:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-03-01 17:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-01 17:43 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170301174738-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).