From: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/1] block: Handle NULL options correctly in raw_open
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 03:15:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170308021533.78292-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Trying to restore rbd image on ceph cluster from snapshot with
qemu-img could trigger a calling to raw_open with a NULL @options
after a calling to raw_close, and that will lead to a failure of
the snapshot applying.
[root@s8345007 ~]# gdb --args qemu-img snapshot -a snap1 rbd:test_pool/dj_image
... ...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000801395a8 in qdict_next_entry (qdict=0x0, first_bucket=0) at qobject/qdict.c:327
327 if (!QLIST_EMPTY(&qdict->table[i])) {
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000801395a8 in qdict_next_entry (qdict=0x0, first_bucket=0) at qobject/qdict.c:327
#1 0x0000000080139626 in qdict_first (qdict=0x0) at qobject/qdict.c:340
#2 0x000000008013a00c in qdict_extract_subqdict (src=0x0, dst=0x3ffffffec50, start=0x80698260 "file.")
at qobject/qdict.c:576
#3 0x0000000080019c26 in bdrv_open_child_bs (filename=0x0, options=0x0, bdref_key=0x8017ab38 "file",
parent=0x80630300, child_role=0x80176108 <child_file>, allow_none=false, errp=0x0) at block.c:2018
#4 0x0000000080019dfa in bdrv_open_child (filename=0x0, options=0x0, bdref_key=0x8017ab38 "file",
parent=0x80630300, child_role=0x80176108 <child_file>, allow_none=false, errp=0x0) at block.c:2065
#5 0x000000008002b9a0 in raw_open (bs=0x80630300, options=0x0, flags=8194, errp=0x0) at block/raw-format.c:387
#6 0x0000000080087516 in bdrv_snapshot_goto (bs=0x80630300, snapshot_id=0x3fffffff75c "snap1")
at block/snapshot.c:194
#7 0x0000000080010b8c in img_snapshot (argc=4, argv=0x3fffffff4c0) at qemu-img.c:2937
#8 0x00000000800140e4 in main (argc=4, argv=0x3fffffff4c0) at qemu-img.c:4373
The problematic caller of raw_open is block/snapshot.c:194:
178 int bdrv_snapshot_goto(BlockDriverState *bs,
179 const char *snapshot_id)
180 {
181 BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
182 int ret, open_ret;
183
184 if (!drv) {
185 return -ENOMEDIUM;
186 }
187 if (drv->bdrv_snapshot_goto) {
188 return drv->bdrv_snapshot_goto(bs, snapshot_id);
189 }
190
191 if (bs->file) {
192 drv->bdrv_close(bs);
193 ret = bdrv_snapshot_goto(bs->file->bs, snapshot_id);
194 open_ret = drv->bdrv_open(bs, NULL, bs->open_flags, NULL);
195 if (open_ret < 0) {
196 bdrv_unref(bs->file->bs);
197 bs->drv = NULL;
198 return open_ret;
199 }
200 return ret;
201 }
202
203 return -ENOTSUP;
204 }
AFAIU, that's because raw_open does not take NULL @options as a
legal parameter. @options should have a "file" key-value pair to
ensure a success open.
I'm not familiar with these code, but after reading them for a
while, I think that raw_close always does nothing, so it seems to
me that a raw_open after a raw_close probably should also do nothing
as well.
I admit that there may be more than one way to detect whether
raw_open is called after raw_close. E.g. introducing a flag to
indicate whether the current BDS is closed, or try to reuse some
existing fields in BDS. But taking NULL @options as a sign of
trying to open again could be the simplest working method jumped
into my mind.
I'd like to send this as a RFC here for more advice, in case I
walked along a wrong way to far. Comments are welcome.
Dong Jia Shi (1):
block: Handle NULL options correctly in raw_open
block/raw-format.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--
2.8.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 2:15 Dong Jia Shi [this message]
2017-03-08 2:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] block: Handle NULL options correctly in raw_open Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-08 9:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-03-08 9:31 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-13 3:31 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-13 10:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-03-14 3:23 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-20 1:39 ` Dong Jia Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170308021533.78292-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).