From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, yi l liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] intel_iommu: check misordered init when realize
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:59:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170308085917.GC7135@pxdev.xzpeter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149211275.29885713.1488962150826.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[...]
> The ordering should be explicit in the command line. Since we do not have
> cycles, it should be possible.
Current QEMU should have no restriction on parameter ordering, right?
Or do we have any existing case that:
"$QEMU -parameter1 -parameter2"
will work, while...
"$QEMU -parameter2 -parameter1"
won't work?
Thanks,
>
> The best solution would have been to add something like
>
> -device intel-iommu,id=root-complex-iommu -global mch.iommu=root-complex-iommu
>
> but it's too late for that.
-- peterx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 3:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] intel_iommu: check misordered init when realize Peter Xu
2017-03-02 5:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-02 5:20 ` Peter Xu
2017-03-02 5:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-02 6:24 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-03-08 8:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-08 8:59 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2017-03-08 9:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-03-10 7:04 ` Peter Xu
2017-03-08 10:08 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-08 13:20 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170308085917.GC7135@pxdev.xzpeter.org \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).