From: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] block: Handle NULL options correctly in raw_open
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:31:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170313033105.GA6756@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308093105.GC7563@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2017-03-08 17:31:05 +0800]:
> * Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> [2017-03-08 10:13:46 +0100]:
>
> > Am 08.03.2017 um 03:15 hat Dong Jia Shi geschrieben:
> > > A normal call for raw_open should always pass in a non-NULL @options,
> > > but for some certain cases (e.g. trying to applying snapshot on a RBD
> > > image), they call raw_open with a NULL @options right after the calling
> > > for raw_close.
> > >
> > > Let's take the NULL @options as a sign of trying to do raw_open again,
> > > and just simply return a success code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > I think we rather need to fix bdrv_snapshot_goto() so that it doesn't
> > pass NULL, but the actual options that were given for the node (i.e.
> > bs->options).
> I've tried that before the current try. bs->options does not have the
> "file" key-value pair, so that leads to a fail too. Should we put "file"
> in to the options manually? I noticed that it was removed from
> bs->options during the calling of bdrv_open_inherit.
>
Hi Kevin,
After thinking for quite some time, I still don't think we need to fix
the caller. The reason is that raw_close always does nothing, so no
matter what the caller passing in, raw_open should do nothing but just
return 0.
The following is another proposal. Looking forward for your comments.
Thanks,
diff --git a/block/raw-format.c b/block/raw-format.c
index 86fbc65..c309d4c 100644
--- a/block/raw-format.c
+++ b/block/raw-format.c
@@ -384,6 +384,11 @@ static int raw_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags,
BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
int ret;
+ if (!bs->file) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ assert(options != NULL);
bs->file = bdrv_open_child(NULL, options, "file", bs, &child_file,
false, errp);
if (!bs->file) {
> >
> > Kevin
> >
>
> --
> Dong Jia
--
Dong Jia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 2:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/1] block: Handle NULL options correctly in raw_open Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-08 2:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] " Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-08 9:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-03-08 9:31 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-13 3:31 ` Dong Jia Shi [this message]
2017-03-13 10:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-03-14 3:23 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-03-20 1:39 ` Dong Jia Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170313033105.GA6756@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).