qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Always call bdrv_child_check_perm first
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:02:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170315120214.GH4030@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315110915.GC3088@lemon.lan>

Am 15.03.2017 um 12:09 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Wed, 03/15 11:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 14.03.2017 um 03:30 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > bdrv_child_set_perm alone is not very usable because the caller must
> > > call bdrv_child_check_perm first.
> > 
> > Well, you can imagine use cases where you want to check multiple
> > children first and then set or abort all of them, but apparently we
> > haven't found such a case yet, so I'm fine with making the functions
> > private for now.  If we ever need it, making them public again is
> > trivial.
> 
> Yes, no problem with that use case but by then I suppose we should also add an
> assertion about the calling sequence: e.g. in image locking, raw_set_perm goes
> nut if not preceded by `raw_check_perm.

Yes, that makes sense.

Kevin

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14  2:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Always call bdrv_child_check_perm first Fam Zheng
2017-03-14 13:28 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-15  3:06   ` Fam Zheng
2017-03-15 11:47     ` Eric Blake
2017-03-15 10:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-03-15 11:09   ` Fam Zheng
2017-03-15 12:02     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170315120214.GH4030@noname.str.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).