From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, mst@redhat.com,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] pcie aer: verify if AER functionality is available
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:12:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328101227.4486ede8@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58DA6972.6020606@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:47:30 +0800
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On 03/25/2017 06:12 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:09:21 +0800
> > Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> For devices which support AER function, verify it can work or not in the
> >> system:
> >> 1. AER capable device is a PCIe device, it can't be plugged into PCI bus
> >> 2. If root port doesn't support AER, then there is no need to expose the
> >> AER capability
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> hw/pci/pcie_aer.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c
> >> index daf1f65..a2e9818 100644
> >> --- a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c
> >> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c
> >> @@ -100,6 +100,34 @@ static void aer_log_clear_all_err(PCIEAERLog *aer_log)
> >> int pcie_aer_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t cap_ver, uint16_t offset,
> >> uint16_t size, Error **errp)
> >> {
> >> + PCIDevice *parent_dev;
> >> + uint8_t type;
> >> + uint8_t parent_type;
> >> +
> >> + /* Topology test: see if there is need to expose AER cap */
> >> + type = pcie_cap_get_type(dev);
> >> + parent_dev = pci_bridge_get_device(dev->bus);
> >> + while (parent_dev) {
> >> + parent_type = pcie_cap_get_type(parent_dev);
> >> +
> >> + if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT &&
> >> + (parent_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> >> + parent_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)) {
> >> + error_setg(errp, "Parent device is not a PCIe component");
> >> + return -ENOTSUP;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (parent_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
> >> + if (!parent_dev->exp.aer_cap)
> >> + {
> >
> > Curly brace at the end of the previous line.
> >
> >> + error_setg(errp, "Root port does not support AER");
> >> + return -ENOTSUP;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + parent_dev = pci_bridge_get_device(parent_dev->bus);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> pcie_add_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR, cap_ver,
> >> offset, size);
> >> dev->exp.aer_cap = offset;
> >
> > This patch makes existing configurations including PCIe root ports,
> > upstream ports, downstream ports, and e1000e fail if they do not meet
> > this new configuration requirement.
> >
>
> Yes, I noticed that e1000e could be realized on i440fx, which I think is
> not possible in real world, like the commit log(1.) said.
>
> But for those ports, what are the conditions they will fail with this patch?
It seems that the algorithm expects a PCIe device on a PCIe machine
type to have PCIe components all the way to the root bus. This is easy
to break with a Q35 machine, DMI-to-PCI bridge (ie. PCIe-to-PCI
bridge), and a PCIe root port. Such a configuration isn't exactly
legitimate from a PCI topology perspective, but QEMU will let you do it.
If we had generic PCIe-to-PCI and PCI-to-PCIe bridges, it could even be
done with a legitimate PCI topology. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 9:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-pci: support recovery of AER non fatal error Cao jin
2017-03-23 9:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] pcie aer: verify if AER functionality is available Cao jin
2017-03-24 22:12 ` Alex Williamson
2017-03-28 13:47 ` Cao jin
2017-03-28 16:12 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-03-28 16:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-23 9:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio pci: new function to init AER capability Cao jin
2017-03-24 22:12 ` Alex Williamson
2017-03-28 13:47 ` Cao jin
2017-03-23 9:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio-pci: process non fatal error of AER Cao jin
2017-03-24 22:12 ` Alex Williamson
2017-03-28 13:49 ` Cao jin
2017-03-28 16:12 ` Alex Williamson
2017-03-28 23:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-29 2:55 ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-25 20:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-04-26 0:06 ` Alex Williamson
2017-03-24 22:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-pci: support recovery of AER non fatal error Alex Williamson
2017-03-28 13:47 ` Cao jin
2017-03-28 16:12 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170328101227.4486ede8@t450s.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).