From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecating old machine types
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:46:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170329164646.GD2501@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3044459b-65a3-ca78-c009-15de9823704a@redhat.com>
* Thomas Huth (thuth@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 27.03.2017 21:04, John Snow wrote:
> >
> > On 03/27/2017 04:06 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 24.03.2017 23:10, John Snow wrote:
> [...]
> >>> I have a list of things I want to axe...
> >>
> >> I've started a Wiki page with such a list here:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/LegacyRemoval
> >>
> >> Feel free to amend!
> >
> > Absolutely!
>
> By the way, what about old machine types like "pc-0.10" ? Do we want to
> carry them along forever (e.g. since it is not too complicated to
> maintain?), or shall we get rid of those one day (e.g. with QEMU 3.0), too?
It seems reasonable to slowly deprecate them.
I'm just not sure how slowly.
Dave
>
> Thomas
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 8:26 [Qemu-devel] What's the next QEMU version after 2.9 ? (or: when is a good point in time to get rid of old interfaces) Thomas Huth
2017-03-08 10:03 ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-08 11:22 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-08 11:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-03-09 12:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-03-09 2:21 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-09 8:50 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-09 9:53 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-09 10:20 ` Yongbok Kim
2017-03-10 11:07 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-10 11:22 ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-10 11:53 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-10 11:58 ` Yongbok Kim
2018-04-24 19:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-03-09 10:11 ` [Qemu-devel] external snapshots freezes block device since qemu 2.8 Piotr Rybicki
2017-03-09 12:26 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-04-05 22:18 ` John Snow
2017-04-06 9:25 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-03-10 14:49 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2017-03-10 15:44 ` Piotr Rybicki
2017-03-08 10:20 ` [Qemu-devel] What's the next QEMU version after 2.9 ? (or: when is a good point in time to get rid of old interfaces) Daniel P. Berrange
2017-03-08 11:19 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-04-12 13:47 ` Marc-André Lureau
2017-04-12 14:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-03-09 16:00 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-03-24 22:10 ` John Snow
2017-03-27 8:06 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-27 12:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-03-27 12:49 ` Peter Maydell
2017-04-03 14:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-11 12:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-04-18 9:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-18 11:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-04-18 17:18 ` John Snow
2017-04-19 5:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-04-19 10:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-04-19 10:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-04-19 23:08 ` John Snow
2017-04-20 5:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-04-20 11:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-03-27 12:56 ` [Qemu-devel] Deprecating the -net option (was: What's the next QEMU version after 2.9 ? (or: when is a good point in time to get rid of old interfaces)) Thomas Huth
2017-03-27 13:09 ` [Qemu-devel] Deprecating the -net option Thomas Huth
2017-03-27 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-27 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] What's the next QEMU version after 2.9 ? (or: when is a good point in time to get rid of old interfaces) John Snow
2017-03-27 19:46 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-29 16:21 ` [Qemu-devel] Deprecating old machine types Thomas Huth
2017-03-29 16:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-03-29 16:54 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-29 16:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-29 21:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-30 8:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-03-28 17:18 ` [Qemu-devel] Deprecating the -drive option is a good point in time to get rid of old interfaces) Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170329164646.GD2501@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).