From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGkM-0005RY-6I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:46:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGkJ-0006hn-37 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:46:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGkI-0006hZ-TP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:46:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70A2C04B310 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:46:46 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20170329164646.GD2501@work-vm> References: <3d1c16a1-ec05-0367-e569-64a63b34f2e3@redhat.com> <4a56f716-3528-ddd4-f8c4-f3f6b23c469a@redhat.com> <3044459b-65a3-ca78-c009-15de9823704a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3044459b-65a3-ca78-c009-15de9823704a@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecating old machine types List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, John Snow , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Juan Quintela * Thomas Huth (thuth@redhat.com) wrote: > On 27.03.2017 21:04, John Snow wrote: > > > > On 03/27/2017 04:06 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 24.03.2017 23:10, John Snow wrote: > [...] > >>> I have a list of things I want to axe... > >> > >> I've started a Wiki page with such a list here: > >> > >> http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/LegacyRemoval > >> > >> Feel free to amend! > > > > Absolutely! > > By the way, what about old machine types like "pc-0.10" ? Do we want to > carry them along forever (e.g. since it is not too complicated to > maintain?), or shall we get rid of those one day (e.g. with QEMU 3.0), too? It seems reasonable to slowly deprecate them. I'm just not sure how slowly. Dave > > Thomas > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK