From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: Ciprian Barbu <Ciprian.Barbu@enea.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
pkrempa@redhat.com,
Alexandru Avadanii <Alexandru.Avadanii@enea.com>,
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
svc-armband <armband@enea.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:00:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403130041.GD5036@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33ced3d3-acd7-2945-518d-465a4621b151@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2000 bytes --]
Am 03.04.2017 um 14:39 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 03.04.2017 10:15, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 31.03.2017 um 19:43 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>
> [...]
>
> >> So in theory all that's necessary is to set share-rw=on for the device
> >> in the management layer. But I'm not sure whether that's practical.
> >
> > Yes, libvirt needs to provide this option if the guest supports sharing.
> > If it doesn't support sharing, rejecting a read-write NBD client seems
> > correct to me.
> >
> > Peter, Eric, what is the status on the libvirt side here?
> >
> >> As for just allowing the NBD server write access to the device... To me
> >> that appears pretty difficult from an implementation perspective. We
> >> assert that nobody can write without having requested write access and
> >> we make sure that nobody can request write access without it being
> >> allowed. Making an exception for NBD seems very difficult and would
> >> probably mean we'd have to drop the assertion for write accesses altogether.
> >
> > Making an exception would simply be wrong.
>
> Indeed. That is why it would be so difficult.
>
> The question remains whether it is practical not to make an exception.
> As far as I know, libvirt is only guaranteed to support older qemu
> versions, not necessarily future ones. So we should be allowed to break
> existing use cases here until libvirt is updated (assuming it is
> possible for libvirt to express "guest device allows shared writes" as
> an option for its next release).
If I understand correctly, this is a case of incoming live migration,
i.e. the virtio-blk device which is blocking the writes to the image
doesn't really belong to a running guest yet.
So if we need to make an exception (and actually reading the context
makes it appear so), I guess it would have to be that devices actually
can share the write permission during incoming migration, but not any
more later (unless the share-rw flag is set).
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-31 16:03 [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs Ciprian Barbu
2017-03-31 17:32 ` Ciprian Barbu
2017-03-31 17:36 ` Ciprian Barbu
2017-03-31 17:43 ` Max Reitz
2017-03-31 17:49 ` Ciprian Barbu
2017-03-31 17:57 ` Max Reitz
2017-03-31 19:07 ` Alexandru Avadanii
2017-04-03 18:52 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2017-04-04 8:07 ` ciprian.barbu
2017-04-03 8:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-03 12:39 ` Max Reitz
2017-04-03 13:00 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2017-04-03 13:50 ` Peter Krempa
2017-04-04 12:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-04 13:51 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-04 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-04 14:53 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-04 15:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-05 11:01 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-05 21:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-06 8:48 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-06 9:03 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-03 19:48 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-03 19:44 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-04 8:17 ` ciprian.barbu
2017-04-04 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-04 11:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-03 12:51 ` Peter Krempa
2017-04-04 13:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-04 13:27 ` Peter Krempa
2017-04-04 13:54 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403130041.GD5036@noname.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=Alexandru.Avadanii@enea.com \
--cc=Ciprian.Barbu@enea.com \
--cc=armband@enea.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).