From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwVaY-0003yA-4j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:14:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwVaV-0002bX-Ee for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:14:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwVaV-0002bO-8D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:14:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 16:14:06 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20170407151405.GB2623@work-vm> References: <20170407143254.22061-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20170407145634.GA2623@work-vm> <130e1495-72f5-7ab5-0f25-0e3cb65006dc@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <130e1495-72f5-7ab5-0f25-0e3cb65006dc@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.10] slirp/smb: Replace constant strings by glib string List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, berrange@redhat.com * Eric Blake (eblake@redhat.com) wrote: > On 04/07/2017 09:56 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > >> The cleanup is useful, and resolves one of the build issues I pointed > >> out earlier on Rawhide (looks like it is now Fedora 26 in addition to > >> Rawhide that have new-enough gcc). In that thread, we argued that it's > >> not going to be essential to get this in for 2.9, but as more and more > >> people move to newer gcc, it will probably be a candidate for > >> qemu-stable for 2.9.1 in addition to 2.10. > > > > Ah which thread is that? > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/threads.html#04552 > in particular > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg04567.html Yep, feels about right. > > I just posted: > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-04/msg01294.html > > Yes, I just saw that. And it is indeed hacky, but maybe it will spur > some proper patches. Yes, and some of those it might be best to see what the gcc people say as to whether they'll fix them. Dave > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK