From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwiqB-0001P3-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 01:23:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwiq8-0004Vb-0V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 01:23:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 12:14:20 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20170408021420.GE27571@umbus> References: <1491396106-26376-1-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> <1491396106-26376-5-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> <20170406042318.GA12179@umbus> <6e24736f-5a64-ea4a-f9bb-6ebed5acca4a@kaod.org> <1491470207.4166.107.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <9a5826c0-5940-f668-fbef-f90f277408e0@kaod.org> <1491480116.4166.108.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <78f1dc04-9c48-1870-9fdc-ff872fecd0de@kaod.org> <1491515614.4166.126.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <7dce9c3b-1cb2-3cec-5f55-51849ca313d0@kaod.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7dce9c3b-1cb2-3cec-5f55-51849ca313d0@kaod.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/21] ppc/pnv: enable only one LPC bus List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org --HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:14:36AM +0200, C=E9dric Le Goater wrote: > On 04/06/2017 11:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 14:35 +0200, C=E9dric Le Goater wrote: > >> but real HW (2 sockets OpenPOWER systems, garrison and firestone) > >> does=20 > >> not expose the LPC bus on the second chip, should we do so in qemu ? > >=20 > > It's not so much HW as it it HostBoot. Not a huge deal. >=20 > So let's have QEMU populate the second LPC bus without the "primary" > prop then. It's a different approach than hostboot, but it's good for > testing anyhow. Works for me. --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY6Ed5AAoJEGw4ysog2bOS7K4QAMmDLFoxAsiklQwPghHU8lt7 g5rH7jVXBcS0qyBx6h2BZ28lsv/yazVZBC3cDMg0LUoxsGkPOJXyWX1GNVlvH+hT urvk6k+6/r0WRn49de1CILeh/sdf1XcLRQyaD6mHsb8UNNvH6juwJWA4Ne4tYwmH TQQ48rXb2Qq6jAn7ApnFXBjqD5tU8OYUYTqk3dHkm/tpSJs2dh/0KgE9ppDoUmtk X4JYs3VaXxosIPlA5wCnJQZXR84Fh0sBVCY+EciozV3xkJjAEKSnJd6TRoycHYmi 16b9QYhLtfTL+d4RqMs3TEt0uwqsHFjVF/PJQ8EvI7ijKSEnvriIhkkV8ohIkecH aN8pzNRmXX9XRLKoKtoCYXjX4VqMQWiLZAtNHJAwfMllsJUiyIsh2Wbre3tKAuXA 15DvZ6ZyoedB8SS4iBIHogOR+j0I6UnMnn2zNxwSO2Z0M/JaxsJ6agujq5G2S3v8 aqUR5rvgaw5Dzf9W998tBL4ZlUb0npGvWSQBhalWZbsmJBuJBcVMFMHAowvYbiaD 0XY7r6k/v4Rs/UfikGlaBx4lv1hsBf6vzZMb9g+dOjfpA0XWlIDL36w+knBvKl7b /qn5tKMlSfxAD2VRFnmI6bRByp3UHT7oDX71F7N0gjY0t11j9Tct6gMJkO8fEcOb /XIner54C2es0A6+60FW =HySJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh--