qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression from 2.8: stuck in bdrv_drain()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:11:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170413011109.GC15762@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412235420.GB8607@lemon>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:54:20AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 04/12 18:22, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 05:38:17PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 04/12/2017 04:46 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This occurs on v2.9.0-rc4, but not on v2.8.0.
> > > > 
> > > > When running QEMU with an iothread, and then performing a block-mirror, if
> > > > we do a system-reset after the BLOCK_JOB_READY event has emitted, qemu
> > > > becomes deadlocked.
> > > > 
> > > > The block job is not paused, nor cancelled, so we are stuck in the while
> > > > loop in block_job_detach_aio_context:
> > > > 
> > > > static void block_job_detach_aio_context(void *opaque)
> > > > {
> > > >     BlockJob *job = opaque;
> > > > 
> > > >     /* In case the job terminates during aio_poll()... */
> > > >     block_job_ref(job);
> > > > 
> > > >     block_job_pause(job);
> > > > 
> > > >     while (!job->paused && !job->completed) {
> > > >         block_job_drain(job);
> > > >     }
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Looks like when block_job_drain calls block_job_enter from this context
> > > (the main thread, since we're trying to do a system_reset...), we cannot
> > > enter the coroutine because it's the wrong context, so we schedule an
> > > entry instead with
> > > 
> > > aio_co_schedule(ctx, co);
> > > 
> > > But that entry never happens, so the job never wakes up and we never
> > > make enough progress in the coroutine to gracefully pause, so we wedge here.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > John Snow and I debugged this some over IRC.  Here is a summary:
> > 
> > Simply put, with iothreads the aio context is different.  When
> > block_job_detach_aio_context() is called from the main thread via the system
> > reset (from main_loop_should_exit()), it calls block_job_drain() in a while
> > loop, with job->busy and job->completed as exit conditions.
> > 
> > block_job_drain() attempts to enter the coroutine (thus allowing job->busy
> > or job->completed to change).  However, since the aio context is different
> > with iothreads, we schedule the coroutine entry rather than directly
> > entering it.
> > 
> > This means the job coroutine is never going to be re-entered, because we are
> > waiting for it to complete in a while loop from the main thread, which is
> > blocking the qemu timers which would run the scheduled coroutine... hence,
> > we become stuck.
> 
> John and I confirmed that this can be fixed by this pending patch:
> 
> [PATCH for-2.9 4/5] block: Drain BH in bdrv_drained_begin
> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-04/msg01018.html
> 
> It didn't make it into 2.9-rc4 because of limited time. :(
> 
> Looks like there is no -rc5, we'll have to document this as a known issue.
> Users should "block-job-complete/cancel" as soon as possible to avoid such a
> hang.
>

I'd argue for including a fix for 2.9, since this is both a regression, and
a hard lock without possible recovery short of restarting the QEMU process.

-Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 20:46 [Qemu-devel] Regression from 2.8: stuck in bdrv_drain() Jeff Cody
2017-04-12 21:38 ` John Snow
2017-04-12 22:22   ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-12 23:54     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-13  1:11       ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2017-04-13  1:57         ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13  5:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-13 14:39           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-13 14:45             ` Eric Blake
2017-04-13 14:50               ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13 15:02             ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13 17:03               ` John Snow
2017-04-13 15:29           ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-13  9:48       ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2017-04-13 14:33         ` Eric Blake
2017-04-13 14:53           ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170413011109.GC15762@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).