From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
jcody@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9-rc5 v4 1/2] block: Walk bs->children carefully in bdrv_drain_recurse
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:54:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418145425.GA12402@lemon.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418144647.GD9236@noname.redhat.com>
On Tue, 04/18 16:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.04.2017 um 16:30 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > The recursive bdrv_drain_recurse may run a block job completion BH that
> > drops nodes. The coming changes will make that more likely and use-after-free
> > would happen without this patch
> >
> > Stash the bs pointer and use bdrv_ref/bdrv_unref in addition to
> > QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE to prevent such a case from happening.
> >
> > Since bdrv_unref accesses global state that is not protected by the AioContext
> > lock, we cannot use bdrv_ref/bdrv_unref unconditionally. Fortunately the
> > protection is not needed in IOThread because only main loop can modify a graph
> > with the AioContext lock held.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/io.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> > index 8706bfa..a0df8c4 100644
> > --- a/block/io.c
> > +++ b/block/io.c
> > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ bool bdrv_requests_pending(BlockDriverState *bs)
> >
> > static bool bdrv_drain_recurse(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > {
> > - BdrvChild *child;
> > + BdrvChild *child, *tmp;
> > bool waited;
> >
> > waited = BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, atomic_read(&bs->in_flight) > 0);
> > @@ -167,8 +167,25 @@ static bool bdrv_drain_recurse(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > bs->drv->bdrv_drain(bs);
> > }
> >
> > - QLIST_FOREACH(child, &bs->children, next) {
> > - waited |= bdrv_drain_recurse(child->bs);
> > + QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(child, &bs->children, next, tmp) {
> > + BlockDriverState *bs = child->bs;
> > + bool in_main_loop =
> > + qemu_get_current_aio_context() == qemu_get_aio_context();
> > + assert(bs->refcnt > 0);
> > + if (in_main_loop) {
> > + /* In case the resursive bdrv_drain_recurse processes a
>
> s/resursive/recursive/
>
> > + * block_job_defer_to_main_loop BH and modifies the graph,
> > + * let's hold a reference to bs until we are done.
> > + *
> > + * IOThread doesn't have such a BH, and it is not safe to call
> > + * bdrv_unref without BQL, so skip doing it there.
> > + **/
>
> And **/ is unusual, too.
>
> > + bdrv_ref(bs);
> > + }
> > + waited |= bdrv_drain_recurse(bs);
> > + if (in_main_loop) {
> > + bdrv_unref(bs);
> > + }
> > }
>
> Other than this, the series looks good to me.
Thanks, I'll fix them and send a pull request to Peter.
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 14:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9-rc5 v4 0/2] block: Drain BH in bdrv_drained_begin Fam Zheng
2017-04-18 14:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9-rc5 v4 1/2] block: Walk bs->children carefully in bdrv_drain_recurse Fam Zheng
2017-04-18 14:46 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-18 14:54 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-04-18 14:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9-rc5 v4 2/2] block: Drain BH in bdrv_drained_begin Fam Zheng
2018-02-06 15:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-02-07 1:48 ` Fam Zheng
2018-02-07 10:51 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-02-07 12:39 ` Fam Zheng
2018-02-07 13:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-02-07 14:14 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-18 14:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9-rc5 v4 0/2] " Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-18 14:51 ` Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170418145425.GA12402@lemon.lan \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).