From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] migrate -b problems
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:14:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170419091451.GC3343@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418153256.GE9236@noname.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2833 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:32:56PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.04.2017 um 16:47 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:18:19AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > after getting assertion failure reports for block migration in the last
> > > minute, we just hacked around it by commenting out op blocker assertions
> > > for the 2.9 release, but now we need to see how to fix things properly.
> > > Luckily, get_maintainer.pl doesn't report me, but only you. :-)
> > >
> > > The main problem I see with the block migration code (on the
> > > destination) is that it abuses the BlockBackend that belongs to the
> > > guest device to make its own writes to the image file. If the guest
> > > isn't allowed to write to the image (which it now isn't during incoming
> > > migration since it would conflict with the newer style of block
> > > migration using an NBD server), writing to this BlockBackend doesn't
> > > work any more.
> > >
> > > So what should really happen is that incoming block migration creates
> > > its own BlockBackend for writing to the image. Now we don't want to do
> > > this anew for every incoming block, but ideally we'd just create all
> > > necessary BlockBackends upfront and then keep using them throughout the
> > > whole migration. Is there a way to get some setup/teardown callbacks
> > > at the start/end of the migration that could initialise and free such
> > > global data?
> >
> > It can be done in the beginning of block_load() similar to
> > block_mig_state.bmds_list, which is created in init_blk_migration() at
> > save time.
>
> The difference is that block_load() is the counterpart for
> block_save_iterate(), not for init_blk_migration(). That is, it is
> called for each chunk of block migration data, which is interleaved with
> normal RAM migration chunks.
>
> So we can either create each BlockBackend the first time we need it in
> block_load(), or create BlockBackends for all existing device BBs and
> BDSes the first time block_load() is called. We still need some place
> to actually free the BlockBackends again when the migration completes.
>
> Dave suggested migration state notifiers, which looked like an option,
> but at least the existing migration states aren't enough, because the
> BlockBackends need to go away before blk_resume_after_migration() is
> called, but MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED is set only afterwards.
>
> > We can also move the if (blk != blk_prev) blk_invalidate_cache() code
> > out of the load loop. It should be done once when setting up
> > BlockBackends.
>
> Same problem as above, while saving has setup/cleanup callbacks, we only
> have the iterate callback for loading.
I see what you are saying. setup/cleanups need to be added to
SaveVMHandlers.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 9:18 [Qemu-devel] migrate -b problems Kevin Wolf
2017-04-12 9:51 ` 858585 jemmy
2017-04-18 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-18 12:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2017-04-18 14:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-18 15:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-19 9:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2017-04-19 11:13 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-04-19 11:18 ` Juan Quintela
2017-04-19 11:20 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-04-19 11:55 ` Juan Quintela
2017-04-19 12:32 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170419091451.GC3343@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).