From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d17Bx-0004rl-CK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 04:11:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d17Bw-0003TQ-3s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 04:11:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:11:42 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170420081142.GE24486@lemon.lan> References: <1492661065-18510-1-git-send-email-lidongchen@tencent.com> <20170420075128.GD24486@lemon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: check bs_n when use old style option List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 858585 jemmy Cc: qemu-devel , Kevin Wolf , Lidong Chen , qemu block , mreitz@redhat.com On Thu, 04/20 15:59, 858585 jemmy wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > > On Thu, 04/20 12:04, jemmy858585@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Lidong Chen > >> > >> When use old style option like -o backing_file, img_convert > >> continue run when bs_n > 1, this patch fix this bug. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen > >> --- > >> qemu-img.c | 7 +++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c > >> index b220cf7..c673aef 100644 > >> --- a/qemu-img.c > >> +++ b/qemu-img.c > >> @@ -2225,6 +2225,13 @@ static int img_convert(int argc, char **argv) > >> out_baseimg = out_baseimg_param; > >> } > >> > >> + if (bs_n > 1 && out_baseimg) { > >> + error_report("-B makes no sense when concatenating multiple input " > >> + "images"); > >> + ret = -1; > >> + goto out; > >> + } > >> + > >> /* Check if compression is supported */ > >> if (compress) { > >> bool encryption = > >> -- > >> 1.8.3.1 > >> > >> > > > > Is this essentially the same as the check a few lines above: > > > > ... > > if (bs_n < 1) { > > error_exit("Must specify image file name"); > > } > > > > > > if (bs_n > 1 && out_baseimg) { > > error_report("-B makes no sense when concatenating multiple input " > > "images"); > > ret = -1; > > goto out; > > } > > > > src_flags = 0; > > ret = bdrv_parse_cache_mode(src_cache, &src_flags, &src_writethrough); > > if (ret < 0) { > > error_report("Invalid source cache option: %s", src_cache); > > goto out; > > } > > ... > > > > How about moving that down? > moving that down is ok. > but will exit later if use -B option. > which way do you think better? Exiting later is not a problem, I assume? And it's better to avoid duplicating code if possible. BTW if you do that way, it's better to "s/-B/Specifying backing image/" in the error message (to be compatible with -o backing_file syntax). Fam