From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2YNx-0003Q2-5j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:26:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2YNs-0006Py-Lr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:26:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2YNs-0006PR-EA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:26:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:26:04 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170424072604.GE316@lemon.lan> References: <3c22d799-1f28-a220-59d7-4218307748e5@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c22d799-1f28-a220-59d7-4218307748e5@gmx.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] NetBSD maintenance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kamil Rytarowski Cc: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers On Mon, 04/24 00:45, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > I will have a look and try to build qemu from git (master branch). > > I also find it surprising that there was a call for CI machines and > there is no infrastructure for it. There are. We use travis and patchew. I don't know a lot about NetBSD testing with travis, but patchew has x86_64 and s390x machines that test patches, and welcomes more OSes/architectures: http://patchew.org/QEMU/20170423223216.17856-1-aurelien@aurel32.net/ If qemu master can be build on NetBDS, I can create a VM for this on my x86_64 machine, or you can generously contribute one, which is even better. :) Fam