From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhuangyanying <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>,
Zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
"wangxin (U)" <wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
Huangzhichao <huangzhichao@huawei.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] Migrate failes between boards with different PMC counts
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:27:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170424102716.GE2362@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424095235.GH20809@redhat.com>
* Daniel P. Berrange (berrange@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:23:21AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Zhuangyanying (ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com) wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Recently, I found migration failed when enable vPMU.
> > >
> > > migrate vPMU state was introduced in linux-3.10 + qemu-1.7.
> > >
> > > As long as enable vPMU, qemu will save / load the
> > > vmstate_msr_architectural_pmu(msr_global_ctrl) register during the migration.
> > > But global_ctrl generated based on cpuid(0xA), the number of general-purpose performance
> > > monitoring counters(PMC) can vary according to Intel SDN. The number of PMC presented
> > > to vm, does not support configuration currently, it depend on host cpuid, and enable all pmc
> > > defaultly at KVM. It cause migration to fail between boards with different PMC counts.
> > >
> > > The return value of cpuid (0xA) is different dur to cpu, according to Intel SDN,18-10 Vol. 3B:
> > >
> > > Note: The number of general-purpose performance monitoring counters (i.e. N in Figure 18-9)
> > > can vary across processor generations within a processor family, across processor families, or
> > > could be different depending on the configuration chosen at boot time in the BIOS regarding
> > > Intel Hyper Threading Technology, (e.g. N=2 for 45 nm Intel Atom processors; N =4 for processors
> > > based on the Nehalem microarchitecture; for processors based on the Sandy Bridge
> > > microarchitecture, N = 4 if Intel Hyper Threading Technology is active and N=8 if not active).
> > >
> > > Also I found, N=8 if HT is not active based on the broadwell,,
> > > such as CPU E7-8890 v4 @ 2.20GHz
> > >
> > > # ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -smp 4 -m 4096 -hda
> > > /data/zyy/test_qemu.img.sles12sp1 -vnc :99 -cpu kvm64,pmu=true -incoming tcp::8888
> > > Completed 100 %
> > > qemu-system-x86_64: error: failed to set MSR 0x38f to 0x7000000ff
> > > qemu-system-x86_64: /data/zyy/git/test/qemu/target/i386/kvm.c:1833: kvm_put_msrs:
> > > Assertion `ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs' failed.
> > > Aborted
> > >
> > > So make number of pmc configurable to vm ? Any better idea ?
> >
> > Coincidentally we hit a similar problem a few days ago with -cpu host - it took me
> > quite a while to spot the difference between the machines was the source
> > had hyperthreading disabled.
> >
> > An option to set the number of counters makes sense to me; but I wonder
> > how many other options we need as well. Also, I'm not sure there's any
> > easy way for libvirt etc to figure out how many counters a host supports -
> > it's not in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> We actually try to avoid /proc/cpuinfo whereever possible. We do direct
> CPUID asm instructions to identify features, and prefer to use
> /sys/devices/system/cpu if that has suitable data
>
> Where do the PMC counts come from originally ? CPUID or something else ?
Yes, they're bits 8..15 of CPUID leaf 0xa
Dave
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-24 6:26 [Qemu-devel] [BUG] Migrate failes between boards with different PMC counts Zhuangyanying
2017-04-24 9:23 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-04-24 9:52 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-24 10:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-04-24 10:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-24 12:57 ` Zhuangyanying
2017-04-25 17:20 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170424102716.GE2362@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=huangzhichao@huawei.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).