From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 18/21] block: Reuse bs as backing hd for drive-backup sync=none
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 21:15:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170426131517.GB9205@lemon.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426125227.GF4538@noname.str.redhat.com>
On Wed, 04/26 14:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>
> The commit message is a bit terse. :-)
>
> So I think this means that instead of opening the backing file of the
> backup (which is probably the active file of the VM) a second time, we
> instead take a reference on the existing node. Very good idea.
>
> In fact, my question is: How did this ever work? Did we just neglect to
> test this? The backup backing file will use stale qcow2 metadata when we
> continue to write to the source.
Reading from the target BDS would be a problem, but I guess it's relatively
uncommon:
- In QEMU code, COW is always done manually in backup_do_cow, so no reading from
target->backing in block layer.
- Writing to target is done in target cluster granularity so no COW too.
But it's still a fully valid point, for example it can be exported to NBD, etc.
>
> Unless I'm missing something, I'd propose this for qemu-stable.
Yes, sounds good.
>
> Also, mirror with MIRROR_OPEN_BACKING_CHAIN probably has a similar
> problem with opening the images in the backing chain a second time.
Seems so. But if there was such a test case, image locking would have
complained.
Is that a practical use case? Mirror target image uses the active image as
backign file? (It's a bit late in the evening, please remind me :-)
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-26 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-26 3:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 00/21] block: Image locking series Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 01/21] block: Make bdrv_perm_names public Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 02/21] block: Define BLK_PERM_MAX Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 9:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 2:03 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 03/21] block: Add, parse and store "force-share" option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 04/21] block: Respect "force-share" in perm propagating Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 05/21] qemu-img: Add --force-share option to subcommands Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 06/21] qemu-img: Update documentation for -U Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 07/21] qemu-io: Add --force-share option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 08/21] iotests: 030: Prepare for image locking Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 09/21] iotests: 046: " Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 10/21] iotests: 055: Don't attach the target image already for drive-backup Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 11/21] iotests: 085: Avoid image locking conflict Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 7:16 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 12/21] iotests: 087: Don't attach test image twice Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 13/21] iotests: 091: Quit QEMU before checking image Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:34 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 7:04 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 14/21] iotests: 172: Use separate images for multiple devices Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 15/21] tests: Use null-co:// instead of /dev/null as the dummy image Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 16/21] file-posix: Add 'locking' option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 2:29 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 17/21] tests: Disable image lock in test-replication Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 18/21] block: Reuse bs as backing hd for drive-backup sync=none Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 13:15 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-04-26 14:34 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 1:50 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 19/21] osdep: Add qemu_lock_fd and qemu_unlock_fd Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 13:20 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 14:29 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-27 1:40 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 20/21] file-posix: Add image locking to perm operations Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 6:43 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-28 13:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-28 15:30 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-28 18:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 21/21] qemu-iotests: Add test case 153 for image locking Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:53 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 1:32 ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-27 9:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 10:34 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170426131517.GB9205@lemon.lan \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).