From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3WEx-0008Sr-EZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:20:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3WEs-00072f-Hj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:20:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3WEs-00072G-Bl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:20:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 02:20:28 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170426192753-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1492076108-117229-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1492076108-117229-3-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <20170413184040-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <58F08A60.2020407@intel.com> <20170415000934-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <58F43801.7060004@intel.com> <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F7391F6DCD@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F7391F6DCD@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_BALLOON_CHUNKS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Wang, Wei W" Cc: "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "david@redhat.com" , "Hansen, Dave" , "cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mgorman@techsingularity.net" , "aarcange@redhat.com" , "amit.shah@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "liliang.opensource@gmail.com" On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:03:34AM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > Hi Michael, could you please give some feedback? I'm sorry, I'm not sure feedback on what you are requesting. The interface looks reasonable now, even though there's a way to make it even simpler if we can limit chunk size to 2G (in fact 4G - 1). Do you think we can live with this limitation? But the code still needs some cleanup. -- MST