qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eblake@redhat.com,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 21/21] qemu-iotests: Add test case 153 for image locking
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:32:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170427013200.GE9205@lemon.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426144948.GL4538@noname.str.redhat.com>

On Wed, 04/26 16:49, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> 
> I'll do the actual review of the test case later, but I already have a
> question... Can we find a way to accept the expected lock losses on
> systems without OFD? I'm using RHEL 7 as my main development OS, so I
> wouldn't like having to deal with false positives there.

Split the lock loss cases to a separate case and _not_run? :)

> 
> Hm... And actually, printing a warning will probably invalidate all the
> other reference outputs, too. After all, every single invocation of
> qemu/qemu-img/qemu-io will print a warning. Maybe that's a bit too much
> even for manual users when they can't do anything about it (which is
> unlike the format probing warning that you can get rid of by simply
> changing your command line).

An idea: make locking=on/off/auto, and auto is on iff OFD is usable, otherwise
off. When user specifies locking=on but OFD is unusable, we print a warning.

Only in this on test case the warning will be printed on RHEL, and it's easy to
filter it out.

Fam

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-27  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-26  3:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 00/21] block: Image locking series Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 01/21] block: Make bdrv_perm_names public Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 02/21] block: Define BLK_PERM_MAX Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  9:36   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  2:03     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 03/21] block: Add, parse and store "force-share" option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 04/21] block: Respect "force-share" in perm propagating Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 05/21] qemu-img: Add --force-share option to subcommands Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 06/21] qemu-img: Update documentation for -U Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 07/21] qemu-io: Add --force-share option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 08/21] iotests: 030: Prepare for image locking Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 09/21] iotests: 046: " Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 10/21] iotests: 055: Don't attach the target image already for drive-backup Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 11/21] iotests: 085: Avoid image locking conflict Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:30   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  7:16     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 12/21] iotests: 087: Don't attach test image twice Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 13/21] iotests: 091: Quit QEMU before checking image Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:34   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  7:04     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 14/21] iotests: 172: Use separate images for multiple devices Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 15/21] tests: Use null-co:// instead of /dev/null as the dummy image Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 16/21] file-posix: Add 'locking' option Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:41   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  2:29     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 17/21] tests: Disable image lock in test-replication Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 18/21] block: Reuse bs as backing hd for drive-backup sync=none Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:52   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 13:15     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:34       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  1:50         ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 19/21] osdep: Add qemu_lock_fd and qemu_unlock_fd Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:57   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 13:20     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:24       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26 14:29       ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-27  1:40         ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 20/21] file-posix: Add image locking to perm operations Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:22   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  6:43     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-28 13:45   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-28 15:30     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-28 18:27       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-26  3:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v15 21/21] qemu-iotests: Add test case 153 for image locking Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 12:53   ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-26 14:49   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27  1:32     ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-04-27  9:05       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-27 10:34         ` Fam Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170427013200.GE9205@lemon.lan \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).