qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] monitor: increase amount of data for monitor to read
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 17:36:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502163629.GA5640@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877f1zcjcf.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org> writes:
> 
> > On 05/02/2017 05:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org> writes:
> >>
> >>> Right now QMP and HMP monitors read 1 byte at a time from the socket, which
> >>> is very inefficient. With 100+ VMs on the host this easily reasults in
> >>> a lot of unnecessary system calls and CPU usage in the system.
> >>>
> >>> This patch changes the amount of data to read to 4096 bytes, which matches
> >>> buffer size on the channel level. Fortunately, monitor protocol is
> >>> synchronous right now thus we should not face side effects in reality.
> >> Can you explain briefly why this relies on "synchronous"?  I've spent
> >> all of two seconds on the question myself...
> > Each command is processed in sequence as it appears in the
> > channel. The answer to the command is sent and only after that
> > next command is processed.
> 
> Yes, that's how QMP works.
> 
> > Theoretically tith asynchronous processing we can have some side
> > effects due to changed buffer size.
> 
> What kind of side effects do you have in mind?
> 
> It's quite possible that this obviously inefficient way to read had some
> deep reason back when it was created.  Hmm, git-blame is our friend:
> 
> commit c62313bbdc48f72e93fa8196f2fff96ba35e4e9d
> Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> Date:   Fri Dec 4 14:05:29 2009 +0100
> 
>     monitor: Accept input only byte-wise
>     
>     This allows to suspend command interpretation and execution
>     synchronously, e.g. during migration.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

I don't think I understand why that's a problem; if we read more bytes,
we're not going to interpret them and execute them until after the previous
command returns are we?

Dave

--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-02 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-02 13:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] monitor: increase amount of data for monitor to read Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-02 14:34 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-02 14:44   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-02 14:49     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-02 14:55       ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-02 15:37   ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-02 14:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-02 15:29   ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-02 16:30     ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-02 16:36       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-05-02 16:48         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-02 17:00           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-02 17:07           ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-03 11:29             ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-03 11:34               ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-10 15:54                 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-10 16:01                   ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-03 11:35               ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-03 11:39                 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-03 11:55                 ` Marc-André Lureau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170502163629.GA5640@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).