From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] monitor: increase amount of data for monitor to read
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 17:36:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502163629.GA5640@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877f1zcjcf.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org> writes:
>
> > On 05/02/2017 05:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org> writes:
> >>
> >>> Right now QMP and HMP monitors read 1 byte at a time from the socket, which
> >>> is very inefficient. With 100+ VMs on the host this easily reasults in
> >>> a lot of unnecessary system calls and CPU usage in the system.
> >>>
> >>> This patch changes the amount of data to read to 4096 bytes, which matches
> >>> buffer size on the channel level. Fortunately, monitor protocol is
> >>> synchronous right now thus we should not face side effects in reality.
> >> Can you explain briefly why this relies on "synchronous"? I've spent
> >> all of two seconds on the question myself...
> > Each command is processed in sequence as it appears in the
> > channel. The answer to the command is sent and only after that
> > next command is processed.
>
> Yes, that's how QMP works.
>
> > Theoretically tith asynchronous processing we can have some side
> > effects due to changed buffer size.
>
> What kind of side effects do you have in mind?
>
> It's quite possible that this obviously inefficient way to read had some
> deep reason back when it was created. Hmm, git-blame is our friend:
>
> commit c62313bbdc48f72e93fa8196f2fff96ba35e4e9d
> Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> Date: Fri Dec 4 14:05:29 2009 +0100
>
> monitor: Accept input only byte-wise
>
> This allows to suspend command interpretation and execution
> synchronously, e.g. during migration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
I don't think I understand why that's a problem; if we read more bytes,
we're not going to interpret them and execute them until after the previous
command returns are we?
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 13:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] monitor: increase amount of data for monitor to read Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-02 14:34 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-02 14:44 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-02 14:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-02 14:55 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-02 15:37 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-02 14:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-02 15:29 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-02 16:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-02 16:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-05-02 16:48 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-02 17:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-02 17:07 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-03 11:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-03 11:34 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-10 15:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-10 16:01 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-03 11:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-03 11:39 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-05-03 11:55 ` Marc-André Lureau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170502163629.GA5640@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).