From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6Yz0-0008CQ-Eq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2017 04:53:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6Yyu-0001QM-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2017 04:53:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6Yyu-0001PC-Q7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2017 04:52:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 16:52:52 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170505085252.GD21435@lemon.lan> References: <20170505032340.26467-1-famz@redhat.com> <03beb071-ebbc-4328-3530-37b9856476cc@redhat.com> <20170505080513.GC21435@lemon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] docker: Add test-block List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 05/05 10:07, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 05/05/2017 10:05, Fam Zheng wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > >> > >> For patch 5, I think we should revive the "quick" qemu-iotests group > >> (maybe we can have support for skipping groups, and have a "slow" group > >> with the very few tests that take >30 seconds?) and add the quick tests > >> to "make check". > > Sounds like a good idea, but for a separate series, IMO. > > > > The idea of the new test-block is to include all qemu-iotests tests. I only > > added raw and qcow2 because vmdk etc. fails case 181. I could use "-x" but > > that's a bit ugly - they can wait for the fix. > > I think that would still be a bit too slow for patchew? We have ~1 hour between each series, this one is not slower than the current docker build tests, so I think it's fine - we can make it run in parallel, like in the case of the s390x build. Fam