From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wei Wang" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Jan Scheurich" <jan.scheurich@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: virtio-net: configurable TX queue size
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 01:08:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170506010644-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b96612b-2fd9-cf65-023e-f72561ec936a@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 05:20:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年05月05日 13:53, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 05/05/2017 10:27 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2017年05月04日 18:58, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I want to re-open the discussion left long time ago:
> > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg06194.html
> > > > , and discuss the possibility of changing the hardcoded (256) TX queue
> > > > size to be configurable between 256 and 1024.
> > >
> > > Yes, I think we probably need this.
> >
> > That's great, thanks.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The reason to propose this request is that a severe issue of
> > > > packet drops in
> > > > TX direction was observed with the existing hardcoded 256 queue size,
> > > > which causes performance issues for packet drop sensitive guest
> > > > applications that cannot use indirect descriptor tables. The
> > > > issue goes away
> > > > with 1K queue size.
> > >
> > > Do we need even more, what if we find 1K is even not sufficient in
> > > the future? Modern nics has size up to ~8192.
> >
> > Yes. Probably, we can also set the RX queue size to 8192 (currently it's
> > 1K) as well.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The concern mentioned in the previous discussion (please check the link
> > > > above) is that the number of chained descriptors would exceed
> > > > UIO_MAXIOV (1024) supported by the Linux.
> > >
> > > We could try to address this limitation but probably need a new
> > > feature bit to allow more than UIO_MAXIOV sgs.
> >
> > I think we should first discuss whether it would be an issue below.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > From the code, I think the number of the chained descriptors
> > > > is limited to
> > > > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 (~18), which is much less than UIO_MAXIOV.
> > >
> > > This is the limitation of #page frags for skb, not the iov limitation.
> >
> > I think the number of page frags are filled into the same number of
> > descriptors
> > in the virtio-net driver (e.g. use 10 descriptors for 10 page frags). On
> > the other
> > side, the virtio-net backend uses the same number of iov for the
> > descriptors.
> >
> > Since the number of page frags is limited to 18, I think there wouldn't
> > be more
> > than 18 iovs to be passed to writev, right?
>
> Looks not, see skb_copy_datagram_from_iter().
>
> Thanks
Besides, guests don't all use linux drivers. Some use e.g.
dpdk pmd ones. It's best not to make assumptions outside
the spec - if you need to make an assumption, it's
best to add a flag to specify it.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-05 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-04 10:58 [Qemu-devel] virtio-net: configurable TX queue size Wang, Wei W
2017-05-05 2:27 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-05 5:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-05-05 9:20 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-05 22:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-05-07 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Yan Vugenfirer
2017-05-08 1:23 ` Wei Wang
2017-05-05 20:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-07 4:39 ` Wang, Wei W
2017-05-10 9:00 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-10 9:59 ` Wei Wang
2017-05-10 9:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang
2017-05-10 20:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-11 5:09 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170506010644-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.scheurich@ericsson.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).